Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34122144›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in physiology2021

Toward Patient-Specific Prediction of Ablation Strategies for Atrial Fibrillation Using Deep Learning.

Marica Muffoletto, Ahmed Qureshi, Aya Zeidan, Laila Muizniece, Xiao Fu, Jichao Zhao, Aditi Roy, Paul A Bates, Oleg Aslanidi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Left atrial appendage morphofunctional indices could be predictive of arrhythmia recurrence post-atrial fibrillation ablation: a meta-analysis.The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology · 2023
    Review
  6. A call for shorter blanking period, time to get off the ground.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Marica MuffolettoSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Ahmed QureshiSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Aya ZeidanSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Laila MuiznieceSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Xiao FuBiomolecular Modelling Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom.
Jichao ZhaoAuckland Bioengineering Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Aditi RoySchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Paul A BatesBiomolecular Modelling Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom.
Oleg AslanidiSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
King's College London · GBThe Francis Crick Institute · GBUniversity of Auckland · NZUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation PG/15/8/31130Cancer Research UK 10748Wellcome Trust FC001003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common cardiac arrhythmia that affects 1% of the population worldwide and is associated with high levels of morbidity and mortality. Catheter ablation (CA) has become one of the first line treatments for AF, but its success rates are suboptimal, especially in the case of persistent AF. Computational approaches have shown promise in predicting the CA strategy using simulations of atrial models, as well as applying deep learning to atrial images. We propose a novel approach that combines image-based computational modelling of the atria with deep learning classifiers trained on patient-specific atrial models, which can be used to assist in CA therapy selection. Therefore, we trained a deep convolutional neural network (CNN) using a combination of (i) 122 atrial tissue images obtained by unfolding patient LGE-MRI datasets, (ii) 157 additional synthetic images derived from the patient data to enhance the training dataset, and (iii) the outcomes of 558 CA simulations to terminate several AF scenarios in the corresponding image-based atrial models. Four CNN classifiers were trained on this patient-specific dataset balanced using several techniques to predict three common CA strategies from the patient atrial images: pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), rotor-based ablation (Rotor) and fibrosis-based ablation (Fibro). The training accuracy for these classifiers ranged from 96.22 to 97.69%, while the validation accuracy was from 78.68 to 86.50%. After training, the classifiers were applied to predict CA strategies for an unseen holdout test set of atrial images, and the results were compared to outcomes of the respective image-based simulations. The highest success rate was observed in the correct prediction of the Rotor and Fibro strategies (100%), whereas the PVI class was predicted in 33.33% of the cases. In conclusion, this study provides a proof-of-concept that deep neural networks can learn from patient-specific MRI datasets and image-derived models of AF, providing a novel technology to assist in tailoring CA therapy to a patient.

Indexed as

atrial fibrillationcatheter ablationclassification algorithmcomputational modellingdeep learningpatient imaging

Identifiers

PMID34122144
PMCPMC8187921
OpenAlexW3164116712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.