Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34122113›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2021

Direct Oral Anticoagulants: From Randomized Clinical Trials to Real-World Clinical Practice.

Roberta Roberti, Luigi Francesco Iannone, Caterina Palleria, Antonio Curcio, Marco Rossi, Angela Sciacqua, Giuseppe Armentaro, Ada Vero, Antonia Manti, Velia Cassano and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 85 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Bridging the Gaps in Atrial Fibrillation Management in the Emergency Department.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Roberta RobertiScience of Health Department, School of Medicine, University "Magna Graecia" of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.
Luigi Francesco IannoneScience of Health Department, School of Medicine, University "Magna Graecia" of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.
Caterina PalleriaScience of Health Department, School of Medicine, University "Magna Graecia" of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.
Antonio CurcioDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University "Magna Graecia" of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.
Marco RossiDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University "Magna Graecia" of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.
Angela SciacquaDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University "Magna Graecia" of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.
Giuseppe ArmentaroDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University "Magna Graecia" of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.
Ada VeroScience of Health Department, School of Medicine, University "Magna Graecia" of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.
Antonia MantiScience of Health Department, School of Medicine, University "Magna Graecia" of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.
Velia CassanoDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University "Magna Graecia" of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.
Emilio RussoScience of Health Department, School of Medicine, University "Magna Graecia" of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.
Giovambattista De SarroScience of Health Department, School of Medicine, University "Magna Graecia" of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.
Rita CitraroScience of Health Department, School of Medicine, University "Magna Graecia" of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.
Magna Graecia University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are a more manageable alternative than vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) to prevent stroke in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and to prevent and treat venous thromboembolism. Despite their widespread use in clinical practice, there are still some unresolved issues on optimizing their use in particular clinical settings. Herein, we reviewed the current clinical evidence on uses of DOACs from pharmacology and clinical indications to safety and practical issues such as drugs and food interactions. Dabigatran is the DOAC most affected by interactions with drugs and food, although all DOACs demonstrate a favorable pharmacokinetic profile. Management issues associated with perioperative procedures, bleeding treatment, and special populations (pregnancy, renal and hepatic impairment, elderly, and oncologic patients) have been discussed. Literature evidence shows that DOACs are at least as effective as VKAs, with a favorable safety profile; data are particularly encouraging in using low doses of edoxaban in elderly patients, and edoxaban and rivaroxaban in the treatment of venous thromboembolism in oncologic patients. In the next year, DOAC clinical indications are likely to be further extended.

Indexed as

clinical practiceDirect oral anticoagulantsdrug–drug interactionspharmacologyrandomized clinical trialssafety

Identifiers

PMID34122113
PMCPMC8188985
OpenAlexW3165163902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.