Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34122066›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2021

Management of Ineffective Esophageal Hypomotility.

Sawangpong Jandee, Annelies Geeraerts, Hannelore Geysen, Nathalie Rommel, Jan Tack, Tim Vanuytsel

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06883175 (Evolution of the Chicago Classification), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06883175 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Evolution of the Chicago Classification: Bridging Physiology and Mechanics

TypeinterventionalSponsorNorthwestern UniversityRan2024 to 2029Enrolled575ConditionsDysphagia, Achalasia, Esophageal, Ineffective Esophageal MotilityArmsFLIP, HRM, Prucalopride
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. The Saudi Gastroenterology Association consensus on the clinical care pathway for the diagnosis and treatment of GERD.Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association · 2024
    Article
  10. A practical approach to ineffective esophageal motility.Neurogastroenterology and motility · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Sawangpong JandeeDepartment of Chronic Diseases, Translational Research Center for Gastrointestinal Disorders (TARGID), Metabolism and Ageing (CHROMETA), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Annelies GeeraertsDepartment of Chronic Diseases, Translational Research Center for Gastrointestinal Disorders (TARGID), Metabolism and Ageing (CHROMETA), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Hannelore GeysenDepartment of Chronic Diseases, Translational Research Center for Gastrointestinal Disorders (TARGID), Metabolism and Ageing (CHROMETA), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Nathalie RommelDepartment of Chronic Diseases, Translational Research Center for Gastrointestinal Disorders (TARGID), Metabolism and Ageing (CHROMETA), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Jan TackDepartment of Chronic Diseases, Translational Research Center for Gastrointestinal Disorders (TARGID), Metabolism and Ageing (CHROMETA), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Tim VanuytselDepartment of Chronic Diseases, Translational Research Center for Gastrointestinal Disorders (TARGID), Metabolism and Ageing (CHROMETA), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
KU Leuven · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Esophageal hypomotility in general and especially ineffective esophageal motility according to the Chicago criteria of primary motility disorders of the esophagus, is one of the most frequently diagnosed motility disorders on high resolution manometry and results in a large number of patients visiting gastroenterologists. Most patients with esophageal hypomotility present with gastroesophageal reflux symptoms or dysphagia. The clinical relevance of the motility pattern, however, is not well established but seems to be correlated with disease severity in reflux patients. The correlation with dysphagia is less clear. Prokinetic agents are commonly prescribed as first line pharmacologic intervention to target esophageal smooth muscle contractility and improve esophageal motor functions. However, the beneficial effects of these medications are limited and only confined to some specific drugs. Serotonergic agents, including buspirone, mosapride and prucalopride have been shown to improve parameters of esophageal motility although the effect on symptoms is less clear. Understanding on the complex correlation between esophageal hypomotility and esophageal symptoms as well as the limited evidence of prokinetic agents is necessary for physicians to appropriately manage patients with Ineffective Esophageal Motility (IEM).

Indexed as

dysphagiaesophageal hypomotilitygastroesophageal refluxhigh resolution manometryineffective esophageal motilityprokinetic

Identifiers

PMID34122066
PMCPMC8187940
OpenAlexW3164724036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.