Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34121991›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2021

Harmonized Segmentation of Neonatal Brain MRI.

Irina Grigorescu, Lucy Vanes, Alena Uus, Dafnis Batalle, Lucilio Cordero-Grande, Chiara Nosarti, A David Edwards, Joseph V Hajnal, Marc Modat, Maria Deprez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. BOUNTI: Brain vOlumetry and aUtomated parcellatioN for 3D feTal MRI.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Neuroimaging in the term newborn with neonatal encephalopathy.Seminars in fetal & neonatal medicine · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Irina GrigorescuCentre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Lucy VanesCentre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Alena UusCentre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Dafnis BatalleCentre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Lucilio Cordero-GrandeCentre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Chiara NosartiCentre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
A David EdwardsCentre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Joseph V HajnalCentre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Marc ModatBiomedical Engineering Department, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Maria DeprezCentre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K006355/1Medical Research Council MR/S026460/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep learning based medical image segmentation has shown great potential in becoming a key part of the clinical analysis pipeline. However, many of these models rely on the assumption that the train and test data come from the same distribution. This means that such methods cannot guarantee high quality predictions when the source and target domains are dissimilar due to different acquisition protocols, or biases in patient cohorts. Recently, unsupervised domain adaptation techniques have shown great potential in alleviating this problem by minimizing the shift between the source and target distributions, without requiring the use of labeled data in the target domain. In this work, we aim to predict tissue segmentation maps on

Indexed as

cortical thicknessdeep learningneonatal brainsegmentationunsupervised domain adaptation

Identifiers

PMID34121991
PMCPMC8195278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.