Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34121909›Full record

ArticleEducation and information technologies2021

What virtual laboratory usage tells us about laboratory skill education pre- and post-COVID-19: Focus on usage, behavior, intention and adoption.

Rakhi Radhamani, Dhanush Kumar, Nijin Nizar, Krishnashree Achuthan, Bipin Nair, Shyam Diwakar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Education and information technologies, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rakhi RadhamaniAmrita Mind Brain Center, Amrita School of Engineering, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Amritapuri campus, Clappana P.O., Kollam, 690525 India.
Dhanush KumarAmrita Mind Brain Center, Amrita School of Engineering, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Amritapuri campus, Clappana P.O., Kollam, 690525 India.
Nijin NizarAmrita Mind Brain Center, Amrita School of Engineering, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Amritapuri campus, Clappana P.O., Kollam, 690525 India.
Krishnashree AchuthanAmrita Center for Cybersecurity Systems & Networks, Amrita School of Engineering, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Amritapuri campus, Clappana P.O., Kollam, 690525 India.
Bipin NairAmrita School of Biotechnology, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Amritapuri campus, Clappana P.O., Kollam, 690525 India.
Shyam DiwakarAmrita Mind Brain Center, Amrita School of Engineering, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Amritapuri campus, Clappana P.O., Kollam, 690525 India.ORCID 0000-0003-1546-0184

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

COVID-19 pandemic has brought uncertainty in educational response, skilling methods, and training practices among teachers and institutions. Even before the pandemic shutdowns, the incorporation of virtual laboratories within classroom education had brought transformations in teaching laboratory courses. Virtual laboratories were integrated as training platforms for complementing learning objectives in laboratory education especially during this pandemic imposed shutdown. In context of suspended face-to-face teaching, this study explores the role of virtual laboratories as Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) in ensuring the continuity of teaching-learning, providing alternative ways for skill training from home. As an innovative approach, the study presents push-pull mooring theory to analyze switching intention of users from offline conventional education to online education. The study explores the complements of physical experiments brought in with animations, simulations, and remote laboratory set-ups for providing skill trainings to learners. To test whether virtualization techniques have global impact in education sector, the study included a comparative analysis of student users during the academic year 2019 (before-COVID) who had a blended approach of learning and those of the year 2020 (post-COVID), with remote learning. Initial before-COVID behavioral analysis on university students (n = 1059) indicated the substantial popularity of virtual laboratories in education for skill training and instructor dependency. Usage adoption of virtual laboratories increased during the pandemic-imposed lockdowns and learners were being less instructor dependent. 24% of students accessed more 10 times a week without the instructor being present and overall, 90% contributed to a minimum of 5 usages a week. In terms of Kolb's learning styles, most of the virtual laboratory learners were assimilators. The results suggest virtual laboratories may have a prominent role in inquiry based and self-guided education with minimum instructor dependency, which may be crucial for complementing practice skills and planning online tools to add to this post-COVID-19 teaching and learning scenarios.

Indexed as

AssessmentCOVID-19Kolb’s learningTechnology acceptanceUsageVirtual laboratories

Identifiers

PMID34121909
PMCPMC8188155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.