Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34121887›Full record

ArticleSaudi journal of biological sciences2021

Stink bug

Haider Karar, Muhammad Amjad Bashir, Abdul Khaliq, Muhammad Jaffar Ali, Reem Atalla Alajmi, Dina M Metwally

Open access · hybridAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Saudi journal of biological sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Haider KararMango Research Institute, Multan, Pakistan.
Muhammad Amjad BashirDepartment of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Ghazi University Dera Ghazi Khan, Pakistan.
Abdul KhaliqCotton Research Institute, Khanpur, India.
Muhammad Jaffar AliDepartment of Plant Breeding and Genetics, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Reem Atalla AlajmiZoology Department College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.
Dina M MetwallyZoology Department College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.
Central Cotton Research Institute · PKCentral Institute for Cotton Research · INGhazi University · PKKing Saud University · SAUniversity of Agriculture Faisalabad · PKZagazig University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fodder crops play an important role in sustainable agriculture as they provide feed for animals, which is ultimately converted to human food. Alfalfa is one of the most important fodder crops having high nutritive value for livestock. However, seed production of alfalfa crop is seriously affected by several factors and the highest reduction in seed yield is caused by stink bug infestation. The current study evaluated different insecticides to control stink bugs during 2016-17. The efficacy of ten insecticides, i.e., acephate, dimethoate, malathion, chlorpyriphos, bifenthrin, lambdacyhalothrin, deltamethrin, acetamiprid, imidacloprid and carbosulfan was tested on

Indexed as

AlfalfaInsecticidesPollinatorsSeed yieldStink bug

Identifiers

PMID34121887
PMCPMC8176121
OpenAlexW3137751085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.