ArticleJournal of computational and graphical statistics : a joint publication of American Statistical Association, Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Interface Foundation of North America2020
A Random Forest Approach for Bounded Outcome Variables.
Article in Journal of computational and graphical statistics : a joint publication of American Statistical Association, Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Interface Foundation of North America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Random forests have become an established tool for classification and regression, in particular in high-dimensional settings and in the presence of non-additive predictor-response relationships. For bounded outcome variables restricted to the unit interval, however, classical modeling approaches based on mean squared error loss may severely suffer as they do not account for heteroscedasticity in the data. To address this issue, we propose a random forest approach for relating a beta dis-tributed outcome to a set of explanatory variables. Our approach explicitly makes use of the likelihood function of the beta distribution for the selection of splits dur-ing the tree-building procedure. In each iteration of the tree-building algorithm it chooses one explanatory variable in combination with a split point that maximizes the log-likelihood function of the beta distribution with the parameter estimates de-rived from the nodes of the currently built tree. Results of several simulation studies and an application using data from the U.S.A. National Lakes Assessment Survey demonstrate the properties and usefulness of the method, in particular when compared to random forest approaches based on mean squared error loss and parametric regression models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.