Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34121797›Full record

ArticleResources policy2021

Is gold favourable than bitcoin during the COVID-19 outbreak? Comparative analysis through wavelet approach.

Khurram Shehzad, Faik Bilgili, Umer Zaman, Emrah Kocak, Sevda Kuskaya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Resources policy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The differential influence of social media sentiment on cryptocurrency returns and volatility during COVID-19.The Quarterly review of economics and finance : journal of the Midwest Economics Association · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Gold or Bitcoin, which is the safe haven during the COVID-19 pandemic?International review of financial analysis · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Khurram ShehzadSchool of Economics and Management, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.
Faik BilgiliErciyes University, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Science, Department of Economics, Turkey.
Umer ZamanEndicott College of International Studies, Woosong University, Republic of Korea.
Emrah KocakErciyes University, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Science, Department of Economics, Turkey.
Sevda KuskayaErciyes University, Justice Vocational College, 38039 kayseri, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The novel coronavirus (COVID-19) has tremendously oscillated the global financial markets. Consequently, investors feel pressured to find safe-haven investments during the pandemic crisis. Numerous studies have evaluated bitcoin's safe-haven properties during the COVID-19; however, the present study considered gold as a potential safe-haven for investors of renowned stock markets of Asia, Europe, and the US. The present investigation computed the ratio of gold to bitcoin (Gold_Bitcoin) and compared the safe-haven properties of gold in contrast to bitcoin. The present study analysed the Morlet Wavelet approach and found that most of the time during the COVID-19, gold investments proved to be more beneficial than bitcoin. Remarkably, the findings highlighted that the Gold_Bitcoin ratio increased in higher and lower frequencies combined with CAC40. In the long run, the return on investments in gold increased in contrast to bitcoin returns pooled with DAX30. Also, the Gold_Bitcoin ratio of the US stock market increased during the one-week and one-month cycles of January and August. Likewise, the Hang Seng Index caused the Gold_Bitcoin ratio to rise at a much higher frequency (i.e., the second half of January, the first half of February and April, and the first half of June and August), whereas IBEX35 surged Gold_Bitcoin at a lower frequency (i.e., during January, February, and August). In higher frequency bands, LSE increased the Gold_Bitcoin ratio (i.e., in February and March); nevertheless, Gold_Bitcoin showed a positive connection with FTSEMIB in the one-to-two month's frequency band (i.e., throughout January, February, and August). Interestingly, the returns on the Gold_Bitcoin ratio increased in the SSEC stock market in the high-frequency band (i.e., during March, May, and July 2020).

Indexed as

BitcoinCOVID-19Financial marketsGoldSafe-havenWavelet approach

Identifiers

PMID34121797
PMCPMC8188464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.