ArticleResources policy2021
Is gold favourable than bitcoin during the COVID-19 outbreak? Comparative analysis through wavelet approach.
Article in Resources policy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Dynamics and Co-movements Between the COVID-19 Outbreak and the Stock Market in Latin American Countries: An Evaluation Based on the Wavelet-Partial Wavelet Coherence Model.Evaluation review · 2023Article
- The differential influence of social media sentiment on cryptocurrency returns and volatility during COVID-19.The Quarterly review of economics and finance : journal of the Midwest Economics Association · 2023Article
- Diversification evidence of bitcoin and gold from wavelet analysis.Financial innovation · 2023Article
- Can gold and bitcoin hedge against the COVID-19 related news sentiment risk? New evidence from a NARDL approach.Resources policy · 2022Article
- Dynamic correlations and portfolio implications across stock and commodity markets before and during the COVID-19 era: A key role of gold.Resources policy · 2022Article
- Degree and structure of return dependence among commodities, energy stocks and international equity markets during the post-COVID-19 period.Resources policy · 2022Article
- Are effects of COVID-19 pandemic on financial markets permanent or temporary? Evidence from gold, oil and stock markets.Resources policy · 2022Article
- Gold or Bitcoin, which is the safe haven during the COVID-19 pandemic?International review of financial analysis · 2022Article
- The resilience of green firms in the twirl of COVID-19: Evidence from S&P500 Carbon Efficiency Index with a Fourier approach.Business strategy and the environment · 2022Article
- Does bitcoin provide hedge to Islamic stock markets for pre- and during COVID-19 outbreak? A comparative analysis with gold.Resources policy · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The novel coronavirus (COVID-19) has tremendously oscillated the global financial markets. Consequently, investors feel pressured to find safe-haven investments during the pandemic crisis. Numerous studies have evaluated bitcoin's safe-haven properties during the COVID-19; however, the present study considered gold as a potential safe-haven for investors of renowned stock markets of Asia, Europe, and the US. The present investigation computed the ratio of gold to bitcoin (Gold_Bitcoin) and compared the safe-haven properties of gold in contrast to bitcoin. The present study analysed the Morlet Wavelet approach and found that most of the time during the COVID-19, gold investments proved to be more beneficial than bitcoin. Remarkably, the findings highlighted that the Gold_Bitcoin ratio increased in higher and lower frequencies combined with CAC40. In the long run, the return on investments in gold increased in contrast to bitcoin returns pooled with DAX30. Also, the Gold_Bitcoin ratio of the US stock market increased during the one-week and one-month cycles of January and August. Likewise, the Hang Seng Index caused the Gold_Bitcoin ratio to rise at a much higher frequency (i.e., the second half of January, the first half of February and April, and the first half of June and August), whereas IBEX35 surged Gold_Bitcoin at a lower frequency (i.e., during January, February, and August). In higher frequency bands, LSE increased the Gold_Bitcoin ratio (i.e., in February and March); nevertheless, Gold_Bitcoin showed a positive connection with FTSEMIB in the one-to-two month's frequency band (i.e., throughout January, February, and August). Interestingly, the returns on the Gold_Bitcoin ratio increased in the SSEC stock market in the high-frequency band (i.e., during March, May, and July 2020).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.