ArticleESC heart failure2021
Psychosocial factors, mental health, and coordination capacity in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction compared with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.
Article in ESC heart failure, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Influence of baseline parameters on one-year physical, mental, and health-related quality of life in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.ESC heart failure · 2021Trial
- Ironing Out the Details: Advancing Diagnosis and Treatment of Iron Deficiency in Patients with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction - A Narrative Review.Heart failure reviews · 2026Review
- Explainable AI models for identifying anxiety and distress in cardiac patients with ICDs.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Article
- Differences in Health-Related Quality of Life among Patients with Heart Failure.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Review
- Sex-specific differences in risk factors, comorbidities, diagnostic challenges, optimal management, and prognostic outcomes of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: A comprehensive literature review.Heart failure reviews · 2024Review
- Effects of Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists on Cardiac Function, Exercise Capacity and Quality of Life.Cardiac failure review · 2024Review
- Article
- Association of Depression and Anxiety with Cardiac Structural and Functional Characteristics in Heart Failure with Reduced and Mildly Reduced Ejection Fraction.Clinics and practice · 2023Article
- Associations between cardiac structure and function and depressive disorder: A centenarian study in China.Heliyon · 2023Article
- Article
- Anxiety and Depression in Metabolic-Dysfunction-Associated Fatty Liver Disease and Cardiovascular Risk.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Psychosocial factors, mental health, and coordination capacity in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction compared with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.ESC heart failure · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsPatients with heart failure (HF) suffer from reduced quality-of-life (QoL). We aimed to compare QoL, depression, and anxiety scores among outpatients with preserved (HFpEF) and reduced (HFrEF) ejection fraction and non-HF controls and its relationship to coordination capacity. METHODS AND
resultsFifty-five participants were recruited prospectively at the University Hospital Jena, Germany (17 HFpEF, 18 HFrEF, and 20 non-HF controls). All participants underwent echocardiography, cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET), 10 m walking test (10-MWT), isokinetic muscle function and coordination tests, and QoL assessments using the short form of health survey (SF-36), and hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS). Furthermore, inflammatory biomarkers such as growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15) were assessed. Patients with HFpEF showed compared with HFrEF and non-HF controls reduced QoL [mental component score (MCS): 43.6 ± 7.1 vs. 50.2 ± 10.0 vs. 50.5 ± 5.0, P = 0.03), vitality (VT): 47.5 ± 8.4 vs. 53.6 ± 8.6 vs. 57.1 ± 5.2, P = 0.004), and elevated anxiety (6.5 ± 3.2 vs. 3.3 ± 2.8 vs. 3.8 ± 2. 8, P = 0.02) and depression scores (6.5 [3.5-10.0] vs. 3.0 [1.0-6.5] vs. 2.0 [0.75-3.0], P = 0.01)]. After adjusting to multiple comparisons, anxiety remained higher in HFpEF patients compared with HFrEF (p
conclusionOutpatients with HFpEF had worse QoL and higher anxiety and depression scores compared with HFrEF and non-HF controls. Depression is associated with reduced QoL and is an independent predictor for reduced coordination capacity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.