Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34121320›Full record

ArticleInternational wound journal2022

Clinical validation of a machine-learning-based handheld 3-dimensional infrared wound imaging device in venous leg ulcers.

Kai Siang Chan, Shanying Liang, Yuan Teng Cho, Yam Meng Chan, Audrey Hui Min Tan, Sivakami Muthuveerappa, Tina Peiting Lai, Cheng Cheng Goh, Annie Joseph, Qiantai Hong and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International wound journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kai Siang ChanVascular Surgery Service, Department of General Surgery, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9533-801X
Shanying LiangVascular Surgery Service, Department of General Surgery, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Yuan Teng ChoVascular Surgery Service, Department of General Surgery, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Yam Meng ChanVascular Surgery Service, Department of General Surgery, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Audrey Hui Min TanWound and Stoma Care, Nursing Service, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Sivakami MuthuveerappaWound and Stoma Care, Nursing Service, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Tina Peiting LaiWound and Stoma Care, Nursing Service, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Cheng Cheng GohWound and Stoma Care, Nursing Service, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Annie JosephSkin Research Institute of Singapore, Agency for Science Technology and Research, Singapore, Singapore.
Qiantai HongVascular Surgery Service, Department of General Surgery, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Enming YongVascular Surgery Service, Department of General Surgery, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Li ZhangVascular Surgery Service, Department of General Surgery, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Lester Rhan Chaen ChongVascular Surgery Service, Department of General Surgery, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Glenn Wei Leong TanVascular Surgery Service, Department of General Surgery, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Sadhana ChandrasekarVascular Surgery Service, Department of General Surgery, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Zhiwen Joseph LoVascular Surgery Service, Department of General Surgery, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2289-5266
Tan Tock Seng Hospital · SGAgency for Science, Technology and Research · SG

Funding

Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR): Industry Alignment Fund - Pre-Positioning; Programme (IAF-PP) H17/01/a0/004 and H19/01/a0/004Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR): Industry Alignment Fund - Pre-Positioning; Programme (IAF-PP) H17/01/a0/004 and H19/01/a0/0Y9Konica Minolta Inc (Tokyo, Japan) - Investigator-initiated
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic venous insufficiency is a chronic disease of the venous system with a prevalence of 25% to 40% in females and 10% to 20% in males. Venous leg ulcers (VLUs) result from venous insufficiency. VLUs have a prevalence of 0.18% to 1% with a 1-year recurrence of 25% to 50%, bearing significant socioeconomic burden. It is therefore important for regular assessment and monitoring of VLUs to prevent worsening. Our study aims to assess the intra- and inter-rater reliability of a machine learning-based handheld 3-dimensional infrared wound imaging device (WoundAide [WA] imaging system, Konica Minolta Inc, Tokyo, Japan) compared with traditional measurements by trained wound nurse. This is a prospective cross-sectional study on 52 patients with VLUs from September 2019 to January 2021 using three WA imaging systems. Baseline patient profile and clinical demographics were collected. Basic wound parameters (length, width and area) were collected for both traditional measurements and measurements taken by the WA imaging systems. Intra- and inter-rater reliability was analysed using intra-class correlation statistics. A total of 222 wound images from 52 patients were assessed. There is excellent intra-rater reliability of the WA imaging system on three different image captures of the same wound (intra-rater reliability ranging 0.978-0.992). In addition, there is excellent inter-rater reliability between the three WA imaging systems for length (0.987), width (0.990) and area (0.995). Good inter-rater reliability for length and width (range 0.875-0.900) and excellent inter-rater reliability (range 0.932-0.950) were obtained between wound nurse measurement and each of the WA imaging system. In conclusion, high intra- and inter-rater reliability was obtained for the WA imaging systems. We also obtained high inter-rater reliability of WA measurements against traditional wound measurement. The WA imaging system is a useful clinical adjunct in the monitoring of VLU wound documentation.

Indexed as

Varicose UlcerCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMachine LearningMaleProspective StudiesReproducibility of Resultschronic venous insufficiencymachine learningvenous leg ulcerwound healingwound imaging

Identifiers

PMID34121320
PMCPMC8762571
OpenAlexW3168390252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.