ArticleDevelopment (Cambridge, England)2021
Global proteomic analyses of human cytotrophoblast differentiation/invasion.
Article in Development (Cambridge, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- An Integrated Proteomics and Genomics Approach to Identify Essential Protein Kinases During Human Trophoblast Development.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2026Article
- Profiling the cytotoxic effects of naled and other pesticides in primary human placental cytotrophoblasts.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2025Article
- Integrated proteomic and transcriptomic landscape of human placenta in small for gestational age infants.iScience · 2024Article
- Perfluorooctanoic acid induces transcriptomic alterations in second trimester human cytotrophoblasts.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2023Article
- Article
- Proteomic analyses of primary human villous trophoblasts exposed to flame retardant BDE-47 using SWATH-MS.Toxicology · 2023Article
- Article
- Macrophage plasticity and function in cancer and pregnancy.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Review
- PD-L1 enhances migration and invasion of trophoblasts by upregulating ARHGDIB via transcription factor PU.1.Cell death discovery · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
During human pregnancy, cytotrophoblasts (CTBs) from the placenta differentiate into specialized subpopulations that play crucial roles in proper fetal growth and development. A subset of these CTBs differentiate along an invasive pathway, penetrating the decidua and anchoring the placenta to the uterus. A crucial hurdle in pregnancy is the ability of these cells to migrate, invade and remodel spiral arteries, ensuring adequate blood flow to nourish the developing fetus. Although advances continue in describing the molecular features regulating the differentiation of these cells, assessment of their global proteomic changes at mid-gestation remain undefined. Here, using sequential window acquisition of all theoretical fragment-ion spectra (SWATH), which is a data-independent acquisition strategy, we characterized the protein repertoire of second trimester human CTBs during their differentiation towards an invasive phenotype. This mass spectrometry-based approach allowed identification of 3026 proteins across four culture time points corresponding to sequential stages of differentiation, confirming the expression dynamics of established molecules and offering new information into other pathways involved. The availability of a SWATH CTB global spectral library serves as a beneficial resource for hypothesis generation and as a foundation for further understanding CTB differentiation dynamics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.