Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34120848›Full record

ArticleJournal of geriatric oncology2022

Improving personalized treatment decision-making for older adults with cancer: The necessity of eliciting patient preferences.

Daniel R Richardson, Kah Poh Loh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of geriatric oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Treatment decision-making for patients with cancer aged 75 and older: perspectives from focus group interviews with patients, family caregivers, and healthcare providers.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Patient perceptions of altering chemotherapy treatment due to peripheral neuropathy.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Daniel R RichardsonDivision of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. Electronic address: daniel_richardson@med.unc.edu.
Kah Poh LohDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.

Funding

Geriatric Oncology Research Infrastructure to Improve Clinical CareR33AG059206 · NIA · BECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE/CITY OF HOPE · PI WILLIAM DALE, Heidi Diana Klepin · 2020 to 2026
$5.1M
A novel mobile health exercise intervention for older patients with myeloid neoplasmsR00CA237744 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI LOH, KAH POH · 2021 to 2023
$747k
A Novel Mobile Health Exercise Intervention for Older Patients with Myeloid NeoplasmsK99CA237744 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI LOH, KAH POH · 2019 to 2020
$385k
NCI NIH HHS K99 CA237744NCI NIH HHS R00 CA237744NIA NIH HHS R33 AG059206
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsPatient PreferenceAgedDecision MakingHumansPatient ParticipationPrecision MedicineClinical decision-makingGeriatric oncologyPatient-centered carePatient outcome assessmentPatient preference

Identifiers

PMID34120848
PMCPMC8660947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.