Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34120770›Full record

ArticleHealth policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2021

Promoting health-enhancing physical activity in Europe: Surveillance, policy development and implementation 2015-2018.

Stephen Whiting, Romeu Mendes, Sara Tribuzi Morais, Peter Gelius, Karim Abu-Omar, Lea Nash, Ivo Rakovac, João Breda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Physical Inactivity Levels of European Adolescents in 2002, 2005, 2013, and 2017.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Stephen WhitingWorld Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark; European Office for the Prevention and Control of Noncommunicable Diseases, World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, Moscow, Russian Federation; EPIUnit - Instituto de Saúde Pública, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal. Electronic address: stephenwhiting6@gmail.com.
Romeu MendesWorld Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark; European Office for the Prevention and Control of Noncommunicable Diseases, World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, Moscow, Russian Federation; EPIUnit - Instituto de Saúde Pública, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Sara Tribuzi MoraisFaculdade de Desporto, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Peter GeliusDepartment of Sport Science and Sport, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Karim Abu-OmarDepartment of Sport Science and Sport, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Lea NashWorld Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Ivo RakovacWorld Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark; European Office for the Prevention and Control of Noncommunicable Diseases, World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, Moscow, Russian Federation.
João BredaWorld Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark; European Office for the Prevention and Control of Noncommunicable Diseases, World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, Moscow, Russian Federation.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the European Union (EU), the low levels of health-enhancing physical activity (HEPA) and high levels of sedentary behaviour are a concerning public health issue common to all Member States. In 2013, the Council of the EU recognized the need for more data related to HEPA to support policymaking across the region and proposed a monitoring framework that included 23 indicators covering different themes relevant to HEPA promotion in the EU context. In 2014, the EU Physical Activity Focal Points Network was established to support the implementation of the monitoring framework and in 2015 and 2018 surveys were conducted to collect epidemiological and policy information related to HEPA for each Member State. This paper aims to provide an update on the status of HEPA policies and surveillance in the EU and describe the changes that have occurred since 2015. In 2018, all countries had implemented more than 10 indicators, 8/28 had implemented 20 or more indicators, and only one country had completed all 23 indicators. From 2015 to 2018, 19 indicators improved, one remained unchanged, and three regressed. From the country perspective, 17 improved the number of accomplished indicators, five maintained the indicators, and five worsened the number of indicators. Overall, there has been a clear increase in the number of countries implementing HEPA policies and strategies across the different sectors, although some heterogeneity between Members Sates was still observed. Implementation of regional physical activity strategies and the establishment of the EU-wide monitoring framework appears to have had an overall positive impact on HEPA policy development and implementation.

Indexed as

ExercisePolicy MakingEuropeHealth PolicyHealth PromotionHumansLegal EpidemiologyEuropeExerciseHealthPhysical activityPolicySports

Identifiers

PMID34120770
PMCPMC8450183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.