Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34120600›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2021

Current status of antenatal care of pregnant women-8 provinces in China, 2018.

Wenling Hu, Huanqing Hu, Wei Zhao, Aiqun Huang, Qi Yang, Jiangli Di

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Prediction of preeclampsia before 11AJOG global reports · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Wenling HuNational Center for Women and Children's Health, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, No.12, Dahuisi Road, Beijing, 100081, China.
Huanqing HuNational Center for Women and Children's Health, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, No.12, Dahuisi Road, Beijing, 100081, China.
Wei ZhaoNational Center for Women and Children's Health, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, No.12, Dahuisi Road, Beijing, 100081, China.
Aiqun HuangNational Center for Women and Children's Health, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, No.12, Dahuisi Road, Beijing, 100081, China.
Qi YangNational Center for Women and Children's Health, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, No.12, Dahuisi Road, Beijing, 100081, China.
Jiangli DiNational Center for Women and Children's Health, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, No.12, Dahuisi Road, Beijing, 100081, China. dijiangli@chinawch.org.cn.
National Center for Women and Children’s Health, China CDC · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntenatal care (ANC) played a crucial role in ensuring maternal and child safety and reducing the risk of complications, disability, and death in mothers and their infants. The objective of this study was to evaluate the current status of ANC emphasizing the number, timing, and content of examinations on a national scale.

methodsThe data was collected from maternal and newborn's health monitoring system at 8 provinces in China. After ethical approval, all pregnant women registered in the system at their first prenatal care visit, we included 49,084 pregnant women who had delivered between January 1, 2018 and December 31, 2018. Descriptive statistics of all study variables were calculated proportions and chi-square for categorical variables.

resultsOf the 49,084 women included in this study, the mean number of ANC visits was 6.95 ± 3.45. By percentage, 78.79% women received ANC examinations at least five times, 39.93% of the women received ANC examinations at least eight times and 16.66% of the women received ANC examinations at least 11 times. The proportion of first ANC examination in first trimester was 61.87%. The percentage of normative ANC examinations and the percentage of qualified ANC examinations were 30.98 and 8.03% respectively. Only 49.40% of the total women received all six kinds of examination items in first ANC examination: 91.47% received a blood test, 91.62% received a urine test, 81.56% received a liver function examination, 80.52% received a renal function examination, 79.07% received a blood glucose test, and 86.66% received a HIV/HBV/syphilis tests. 50.85% women received the first ANC examination in maternal and child health care (MCH) institutions, 14.07% in a general hospital, 18.83% in a township hospital, 13.15% in a community health services center, and 3.08% in an unspecified place. The proportion of women who received each of the ANC examination items in community health services center was the highest, but that in the MCH institutions was the lowest.

conclusionsThere is a big difference between the results of this study and the data in official reports, this study found the current status of antenatal care is not optimal in China, findings from this study suggest that the systematization, continuity and quality of ANC examinations need to be improved.

Indexed as

Prenatal CareSyphilisChildChinaFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornPregnancyPregnancy Trimester, FirstPregnant PeopleAntenatal careChinaCurrent statusPregnant women

Identifiers

PMID34120600
PMCPMC8201670
OpenAlexW3168341538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.