ArticleBMC medical genomics2021
Novel combined variants of WT1 and TET2 in a refractory and recurrent AML patient.
Article in BMC medical genomics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSomatic mutations in Wilms' tumor 1 (WT1) and tet methylcytosine dioxygenase 2 (TET2) genes were separately perceived as contributors to hematopoietic disorders and usually thought to have a mutually exclusive effect in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, we found novel WT1 and TET2 variants persistently co-existed in a refractory and recurrent AML patient with t(9;11)(p21.3;q23.3); KMT2A-MLLT3, and were only detectable genetic alteration in early recurrence. Hence, these two novel variants were further investigated in patient's family, and the potential effect on disease progression was evaluated at follow-up. CASE PRESENTATION: A 27-year-old male was diagnosed with AML, having t(9;11)(p21.3;q23.3); KMT2A-MLLT3, accompanied by WT1 (NM_024426.6:exon7:c.1109G>C:p.Arg370Pro) and TET2 (NM_001127208.3:exon11:c.5530G>A:p.Asp1844Asn) variants. After two cycles of induction chemotherapy, complete remission was achieved. A consolidation treatment was then completed. However, the evaluation of the bone marrow revealed that early recurrence, WT1 (p.Arg370Pro) and TET2 (p.Asp1844Asn) variants still detectable, instead of KMT2A-MLLT3. Subsequently, these two variants were proved to be germline variants, which inherited from father and mother respectively. And the patient's elder brother also carried TET2 (p.Asp1844Asn) variant. A sequential allogeneic HLA-matched sible hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) was carried out, and the donor is the patient's elder brother, the original two variants of patient were replaced by the donor-derived TET2 (p.Asp1844Asn) variant after allo-HSCT; the patient has remained in complete remission with regular follow-up.
conclusionsIn brief, it is firstly reported that WT1 p.Arg370Pro and TET2 p.Asp1844Asn variants co-existed in a refractory and recurrent AML patient by inheritance. These two variants of the patient were replaced with donor-derived TET2 p.Asp1844Asn after allo-HSCT, and the patient has remained in complete remission with regular follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.