Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34120262›Full record

ReviewBrain structure & function2021

An egocentric straight-ahead bias in primate's vision.

Benoit R Cottereau, Yves Trotter, Jean-Baptiste Durand

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain structure & function, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Benoit R CottereauCentre de Recherche Cerveau Et Cognition, Université de Toulouse, 31052, Toulouse, France. benoit.cottereau@cnrs.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2624-7680
Yves TrotterCentre de Recherche Cerveau Et Cognition, Université de Toulouse, 31052, Toulouse, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4706-9510
Jean-Baptiste DurandCentre de Recherche Cerveau Et Cognition, Université de Toulouse, 31052, Toulouse, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4780-8691
Université Fédérale de Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées · FR

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-12-BSV4-0005Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-16-CE37-0002-01Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-18-CE37-0022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As we plan to reach or manipulate objects, we generally orient our body so as to face them. Other objects occupying the same portion of space will likely represent potential obstacles for the intended action. Thus, either as targets or as obstacles, the objects located straight in front of us are often endowed with a special behavioral status. Here, we review a set of recent electrophysiological, imaging and behavioral studies bringing converging evidence that the objects which lie straight-ahead are subject to privileged visual processing. More precisely, these works collectively demonstrate that when gaze steers central vision away from the straight-ahead direction, the latter is still prioritized in peripheral vision. Straight-ahead objects evoke (1) stronger neuronal responses in macaque peripheral V1 neurons, (2) stronger EEG and fMRI activations across the human visual cortex and (3) faster reactive hand and eye movements. Here, we discuss the functional implications and underlying mechanisms behind this phenomenon. Notably, we propose that it can be considered as a new type of visuospatial attentional mechanism, distinct from the previously documented classes of endogenous and exogenous attention.

Indexed as

Vision, OcularVisual CortexAnimalsMacacaPhotic StimulationVisual PerceptionAttentionGain fieldsGazeStraight-aheadVisual cortex

Identifiers

PMID34120262
PMCPMC8541962
OpenAlexW3169692804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.