Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34120247›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2021

Effectiveness of naloxegol in patients with cancer pain suffering from opioid-induced constipation.

Antoine Lemaire, Yoann Pointreau, Bérengère Narciso, François-Xavier Piloquet, Viorica Braniste, Jean-Marc Sabaté

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Constipation in Cancer Patients - an Update of Clinical Evidence.Current treatment options in oncology · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Antoine LemaireOncology and Medical Specialties Department, Valenciennes General Hospital, Valenciennes, France. lemaire-a@ch-valenciennes.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3612-5388
Yoann PointreauOncology and Radiotherapy Department, Inter-regional Institute of Oncology (ILC) - Jean Bernard Center, Le Mans, France.
Bérengère NarcisoMedical Oncology Department, Bretonneau Regional University Hospital Center, Tours, France.
François-Xavier PiloquetOncology and Medical Specialties Department, West Oncology Institute - René Gauducheau Center, St. Herblain, France.
Viorica BranisteMedical Department, Kyowa Kirin Pharma, Neuilly-sur-Seine, France.
Jean-Marc SabatéGastroenterology and Digestive Oncology Department, Avicenne Hospital, AP-HP, Bobigny, France.
Centre Hospitalier de Valenciennes · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Tours · FRCentre Jean Bernard · FRInserm · FRInstitut Génétique Nantes Atlantique · FRKyowa Kirin (France) · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeNaloxegol, an oral once-daily peripherally acting mu-opioid receptor antagonist, is indicated for the treatment of opioid-induced constipation (OIC) with inadequate response to laxative(s), in cancer and non-cancer patients. This study mainly aimed to assess in real-life conditions the efficacy and safety of naloxegol in cancer pain patients and the evolution of their quality of life.

methodsA non-interventional, 4-week follow-up study was conducted in 24 French oncology and pain centers between 2018 and 2019. Eligible patients were aged ≥ 18 years, treated with opioids for cancer pain, and started naloxegol for OIC with inadequate response to laxatives. The rate of the response to naloxegol (primary criterion) was assessed at W4. The evolution of quality of life was measured using the Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life (PAC-QOL).

resultsA total of 124 patients were included (mean age, 62 ± 12 years; ECOG ≤ 2, 79%; primary cancer, lung 18%, breast 16%, prostate 11%, head and neck 9%, digestive 9%…; metastatic stage, 80%). At inclusion, the median opioid dosage was 60 mg of oral morphine or equivalent. At W4, the response rate was 73.4% (95% CI [63.7-83.2%]), and 62.9% (95% CI [51.5-74.2%]) of patients had a clinically relevant change in quality of life (decrease in PAC-QOL score ≥ 0.5 point). Adverse events related to naloxegol were reported in 8% of patients (7% with gastrointestinal events; one serious diarrhea).

conclusionThis real-world study shows that naloxegol is effective and well tolerated in cancer pain patients with OIC and that their quality of life improves under treatment.

Indexed as

Cancer PainNeoplasmsOpioid-Induced ConstipationAgedAnalgesics, OpioidConstipationFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedMorphinansPolyethylene GlycolsQuality of LifeAnalgesics, OpioidMorphinansnaloxegolPolyethylene GlycolsCancerConstipationNaloxegolOpioidsPain

Identifiers

PMID34120247
PMCPMC8549935
OpenAlexW3132304675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.