Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34120244›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2021

Risk assessment of the anthropogenic activities (quarrying) and heavy metal profile in mining environment.

Israel Godwin Nwovu, Ike Oluka, Omaka N Omaka, Obinna A Oje

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Israel Godwin NwovuDepartment of Bioresources Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Enugu State University of Science and Technology (ESUT), Enugu, Enugu State, Nigeria.
Ike OlukaDepartment of Bioresources Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Enugu State University of Science and Technology (ESUT), Enugu, Enugu State, Nigeria.
Omaka N OmakaDepartment of Chemistry / Biochemistry / Molecular Biology, Faculty of Science, Alex Ekwueme Federal University Ndufu Alike Ikwo (FUNAI), Abakaliki, Nigeria.
Obinna A OjeDepartment of Chemistry / Biochemistry / Molecular Biology, Faculty of Science, Alex Ekwueme Federal University Ndufu Alike Ikwo (FUNAI), Abakaliki, Nigeria. obinna.oje@funai.edu.ng.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0371-2604
Enugu State University of Science and Technology · NGFunai Electric (Japan) · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The need to generate internal revenue by most individuals and government in Nigeria has led to the establishment of quarries in different parts of Ebonyi state of Nigeria. This study was aimed at determining the risk associated with the heavy metal burden in the state. Soil samples from the quarrying environments designated as MS1, MS2, and MS3 were analyzed for the metal profile using inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES). The result showed that the mean concentration of metals which is a representation of the whole sites showed a higher concentration of Ca (40.065 ± 1.011 ppm), Mg (12.450 ± 8.815 ppm), K (16.631 ± 14.670 ppm), and Mn (19.539 ± 3.225 ppm) while Na (1.326 ± 0.117 ppm) was low. The heavy metal profile showed Pb (0.120 ± 0.027 ppm), Fe (27.718 ± 1.523 ppm), Zn (2.227 ± 0.570 ppm), Cu (6.267 ± 1.402 ppm), Ni (1.856 ± 0.472 ppm), Mo (1.758 ± 0.258 ppm), Cd (0.023 ± 0.006 ppm), Cr (0.037 ± 0.011 ppm), etc. Hg was found to be below detectable limit while the Cs was not radioactive. The mean values were found to be lower than the permissible limit of each metal. The pollution index (PI) was calculated for the different sites, and the result reveals that MS3 (0.0426) had a higher PI when compared to MS1 (0.0341) and MS2 (0.0317). Therefore, the PI of the sites showed MS3 > MS1 > MS2. These results showed that the environment is still as safe as PI < 1. The geoaccumulation index also showed a safe environment since its values were less than 0 which means that the environment is practically uncontaminated. Other risk determining parameters showed that the three locations were still within a safe level. Although the results of the study have shown a safe environment, it is still necessary to keep close monitoring of the heavy metal profile of the environment, since these metals can bioaccumulate in living tissues with time.

Indexed as

Metals, HeavySoil PollutantsEnvironmental MonitoringHumansNigeriaRisk AssessmentSoilMetals, HeavySoilSoil PollutantsContamination factor (CF)Geoaccumulation indexHeavy metalsPollution index

Identifiers

PMID34120244
OpenAlexW3170604242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.