Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34120224›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2021

Predicting pathological axillary lymph node status with ultrasound following neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer.

Ida Skarping, Daniel Förnvik, Sophia Zackrisson, Signe Borgquist, Lisa Rydén

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Ida SkarpingDivision of Oncology and Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden. ida.skarping@med.lu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1265-8649
Daniel FörnvikMedical Radiation Physics, Department of Translational Medicine, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5083-7624
Sophia ZackrissonDiagnostic Radiology, Department of Translational Medicine, Department of Imaging and Functional Medicine, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund and Malmö, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5678-3882
Signe Borgquist *Division of Oncology and Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7938-8893
Lisa Rydén *Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7515-3130
Lund University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeHigh-performing imaging and predictive markers are warranted to minimize surgical overtreatment of the axilla in breast cancer (BC) patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). Here we have investigated whether axillary ultrasound (AUS) could identify axillary lymph node (ALN) metastasis (ALNM) pre-NACT and post-NACT for BC. The association of tumor, AUS features and mammographic density (MD) with axillary-pathological complete response (axillary-pCR) post-NACT was also assessed.

methodsThe NeoDense-study cohort (N = 202, NACT during 2014-2019), constituted a pre-NACT cohort, whereas patients whom had a cytology verified ALNM pre-NACT and an axillary dissection performed (N = 114) defined a post-NACT cohort. AUS characteristics were prospectively collected pre- and post-NACT. The diagnostic accuracy of AUS was evaluated and stratified by histological subtype and body mass index (BMI). Predictors of axillary-pCR were analyzed, including MD, using simple and multivariable logistic regression models.

resultsAUS demonstrated superior performance for prediction of ALNM pre-NACT in comparison to post-NACT, as reflected by the positive predictive value (PPV) 0.94 (95% CI 0.89-0.97) and PPV 0.76 (95% CI 0.62-0.87), respectively. We found no difference in AUS performance according to neither BMI nor histological subtype. Independent predictors of axillary-pCR were: premenopausal status, ER-negativity, HER2-overexpression, and high MD.

conclusionBaseline AUS could, to a large extent, identify ALNM; however, post-NACT, AUS was insufficient to determine remaining ALNM. Thus, our results support the surgical staging of the axilla post-NACT. Baseline tumor biomarkers and patient characteristics were predictive of axillary-pCR. Larger, multicenter studies are needed to evaluate the performance of AUS post-NACT.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsNeoadjuvant TherapyAxillaFemaleHumansLymph NodesNeoplasm StagingRetrospective StudiesSentinel Lymph Node BiopsyAxillary lymph nodesBreast cancerImagingNeoadjuvant chemotherapyUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID34120224
PMCPMC8302508
OpenAlexW3170910995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.