ArticleSocial science & medicine (1982)2021
Emotional distress among frontline research staff.
Article in Social science & medicine (1982), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Violence in harm reduction: Exploring the social, political, and emotional conditions of harm reduction work.Medical anthropology quarterly · 2026Article
- Connections between science and care within public and global health research: the need for attention and action.Journal of global health · 2026Article
- Doing Good Well in Unethical Times: A Call to Action for HIV Prevention Research.AIDS and behavior · 2026Article
- "The most stress comes from witnessing the abuse of children" -challenges faced by research assistants in community-based research in Mtwara, Tanzania.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Case study guided development of an implementation science framework and checklist for campus sexual violence intervention.BMC global and public health · 2025Article
- Review
- Ten simple rules for research with humans.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Addressing Potential Researcher Distress in Nurse-Led Research: Ethical Considerations and Practical Strategies.Journal of advanced nursing · 2025Review
- How can the ethical conduct of verbal autopsies be enhanced? Lessons from Southeast Asia.Global bioethics = Problemi di bioetica · 2025Article
- Global Is Local: Leveraging Global Mental-Health Methods to Promote Equity and Address Disparities in the United States.Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2024Article
- Towards painless and productive research relationships: reflections on study design by a researcher with chronic pain for participants with chronic pain.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Considering Risks to Researchers and Staff in Low-Resource Settings during Public Health Crises: A Proposed Conceptual Model.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- 'Maybe I Shouldn't Talk': The Role of Power in the Telling of Mental Health Recovery Stories.Qualitative health research · 2022Article
- Predictive Factors of the Burnout Syndrome Occurrence in the Healthcare Workers During the COVID-19 Pandemic.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
- Building Qualitative Research Capacity in Implementation Laboratories: Outcomes of a Structured Training Program in ICON-3 PBRN, Nigeria.Journal of medical education and curricular developmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Public health research frequently deals with sensitive topics. A growing body of evidence suggests that frontline researchers who elicit or process participant's traumatic experiences are themselves at risk of developing emotional distress or secondary trauma from daily immersion in these data. This both threatens a study's data quality and calls into question how the harms and benefits of conducting research are distributed across a study team. The objective of this study was to explore how frontline research staff in Eswatini experience and process emotional distress as part of their daily work and to describe potential strategies for resilience and coping using qualitative research methods. We conducted 21 in-depth interviews with informants who had worked in data collection, data entry, and transcription on a number of sensitive topics, including HIV, sex work, and LGBT health. We found that emotional distress is a salient experience among frontline research staff working in Eswatini. This distress stems from conducting research against a generalized backdrop of high rates of HIV, violence, and poverty, particularly since research staff are drawn from affected communities and have their own firsthand knowledge of the phenomena they are studying. Moreover, the qualities study staff are often hired for - empathy, compassion, and emotional intelligence - are also traits that may increase their likelihood of feeling distressed by the narratives they encounter in their work. The workplace can serve as a prism, exacerbating or potentially mitigating these risks into harm at the individual, interpersonal, and community level. While not all study teams may have access to formal mental health services, several informants recommended incorporating regular meetings with a trained counselor as part of the overall project. Others recommended building time for team-building or debriefing conversations into the normal workweek, a strategy that would address both the issue of workload and could bolster the already existent strategy of relying on team members for mental health support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.