Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34120087›Full record

ArticleSocial science & medicine (1982)2021

Emotional distress among frontline research staff.

Megan Nguyen, Lloyd Goldsamt, Nonhlanhla Mazibuko, Sanelisiwe Zondo, Rebecca Fielding-Miller

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social science & medicine (1982), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Ten simple rules for research with humans.PLoS computational biology · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Global Is Local: Leveraging Global Mental-Health Methods to Promote Equity and Address Disparities in the United States.Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Megan NguyenUniversity of California, San Diego Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health, USA.
Lloyd GoldsamtNew York University, USA.
Nonhlanhla MazibukoIndependent Research Consultant, Mbabane, Eswatini.
Sanelisiwe ZondoIndependent Research Consultant, Mbabane, Eswatini.
Rebecca Fielding-MillerUniversity of California, San Diego Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health, USA. Electronic address: rfieldingmiller@health.ucsd.edu.
University of California San Diego · USNew York University · US

Funding

Training Program in HIV Prevention Research EthicsR25DA031608 · NIDA · FORDHAM UNIVERSITY · PI FISHER, CELIA B · 2011 to 2025
$4.9M
Social-structural and spatial determinants of HIV testing and linkage to care among high risk women in TanzaniaK01MH112436 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI FIELDING-MILLER, REBECCA KATHLEEN · 2017 to 2021
$941k
Ethical collaborations between substance abuse researchers and community groupsR21DA039782 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI DAVIDSON, PETER JOHN · 2015 to 2016
$440k
NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA039782NIDA NIH HHS R25 DA031608NIMHD NIH HHS L60 MD011114NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH112436
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Public health research frequently deals with sensitive topics. A growing body of evidence suggests that frontline researchers who elicit or process participant's traumatic experiences are themselves at risk of developing emotional distress or secondary trauma from daily immersion in these data. This both threatens a study's data quality and calls into question how the harms and benefits of conducting research are distributed across a study team. The objective of this study was to explore how frontline research staff in Eswatini experience and process emotional distress as part of their daily work and to describe potential strategies for resilience and coping using qualitative research methods. We conducted 21 in-depth interviews with informants who had worked in data collection, data entry, and transcription on a number of sensitive topics, including HIV, sex work, and LGBT health. We found that emotional distress is a salient experience among frontline research staff working in Eswatini. This distress stems from conducting research against a generalized backdrop of high rates of HIV, violence, and poverty, particularly since research staff are drawn from affected communities and have their own firsthand knowledge of the phenomena they are studying. Moreover, the qualities study staff are often hired for - empathy, compassion, and emotional intelligence - are also traits that may increase their likelihood of feeling distressed by the narratives they encounter in their work. The workplace can serve as a prism, exacerbating or potentially mitigating these risks into harm at the individual, interpersonal, and community level. While not all study teams may have access to formal mental health services, several informants recommended incorporating regular meetings with a trained counselor as part of the overall project. Others recommended building time for team-building or debriefing conversations into the normal workweek, a strategy that would address both the issue of workload and could bolster the already existent strategy of relying on team members for mental health support.

Indexed as

Mental HealthPsychological DistressAdaptation, PsychologicalEswatiniHumansQualitative ResearchWorkplaceEswatiniGlobal healthHIVPublic healthResearcher traumaResearch ethics

Identifiers

PMID34120087
PMCPMC10484114
OpenAlexW3167683369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.