Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34119744›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in chemical biology2021

Caged lipids for subcellular manipulation.

Scotland Farley, Aurélien Laguerre, Carsten Schultz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in chemical biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Exploring lipid-protein interactions in plant membranes.Journal of experimental botany · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Chemical Tools for Lipid Cell Biology.Accounts of chemical research · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Imaging and Editing the Phospholipidome.Accounts of chemical research · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Scotland FarleyDept. Chemical Physiology & Biochemistry, Oregon Health and Science University (OHSU), Portland, OR, USA.
Aurélien LaguerreDept. Chemical Physiology & Biochemistry, Oregon Health and Science University (OHSU), Portland, OR, USA.
Carsten SchultzDept. Chemical Physiology & Biochemistry, Oregon Health and Science University (OHSU), Portland, OR, USA. Electronic address: schulcar@ohsu.edu.

Funding

Determining the role of sphingolipids in Mycobacterium tuberculosis infectionR01AI141549 · NIAID · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI TAFESSE, FIKADU G. · 2020 to 2025
$2.4M
Chemical biology tools for studying growth factor receptor internalizationR01GM127631 · NIGMS · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI SCHULTZ, CARSTEN · 2018 to 2024
$2.4M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI141549NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM127631
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present recently developed strategies to manipulate lipid levels in live cells by light. We focus on photoremovable protecting groups that lead to subcellular restricted localization and activation and discuss alternative techniques. We emphasize the development of organelle targeting of caged lipids and discuss recent advances in chromatic orthogonality of caging groups for future applications.

Indexed as

LipidsLipidsFluorescenceLipid transportPhotoactivationSignaling

Identifiers

PMID34119744
PMCPMC8660957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.