Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34119522›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of biological chemistry2021

Toward the solution of the protein structure prediction problem.

Robin Pearce, Yang Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 122 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Bridging Scales: Coarse-Grained Protein Models in Computational Biology.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Protein Structure Prediction Methods.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Protein subcellular localization prediction tools.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Review
  14. PLMC: Language Model of Protein Sequences Enhances Protein Crystallization Prediction.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2024
    Article
  15. Evolving ω-amine transaminaseApplied and environmental microbiology · 2024
    Article
  16. Petabase-Scale Homology Search for Structure Prediction.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Recent Progress of Protein Tertiary Structure Prediction.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Robin PearceDepartment of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Yang ZhangDepartment of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA; Department of Biological Chemistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA. Electronic address: zhng@umich.edu.
University of Michigan · US

Funding

Structure-based functional annotation of microbial genomesR01AI134678 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Lydia Petra Freddolino, SCOTT J. HULTGREN · 2018 to 2026
$6.5M
Proteogenomics of Cancer Training ProgramT32CA140044 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI RAO, ARVIND, SARTOR, MAUREEN AGNES · 2010 to 2024
$3.9M
Advanced approaches to protein structure predictionR35GM136422 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ZHANG, YANG · 2020 to 2021
$946k
High-Performance Computing Cluster for Biomedical ResearchS10OD026825 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ATHEY, BRIAN DAVID · 2020 to 2020
$600k
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA140044NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI134678NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM136422NIH HHS S10 OD026825
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since Anfinsen demonstrated that the information encoded in a protein's amino acid sequence determines its structure in 1973, solving the protein structure prediction problem has been the Holy Grail of structural biology. The goal of protein structure prediction approaches is to utilize computational modeling to determine the spatial location of every atom in a protein molecule starting from only its amino acid sequence. Depending on whether homologous structures can be found in the Protein Data Bank (PDB), structure prediction methods have been historically categorized as template-based modeling (TBM) or template-free modeling (FM) approaches. Until recently, TBM has been the most reliable approach to predicting protein structures, and in the absence of reliable templates, the modeling accuracy sharply declines. Nevertheless, the results of the most recent community-wide assessment of protein structure prediction experiment (CASP14) have demonstrated that the protein structure prediction problem can be largely solved through the use of end-to-end deep machine learning techniques, where correct folds could be built for nearly all single-domain proteins without using the PDB templates. Critically, the model quality exhibited little correlation with the quality of available template structures, as well as the number of sequence homologs detected for a given target protein. Thus, the implementation of deep-learning techniques has essentially broken through the 50-year-old modeling border between TBM and FM approaches and has made the success of high-resolution structure prediction significantly less dependent on template availability in the PDB library.

Indexed as

Protein ConformationMachine LearningMolecular Dynamics SimulationSequence AlignmentSequence Analysis, Proteincontact mapdeep learningdistance predictionend-to-end structure predictionfree modelingmultiple sequence alignmentprotein structure predictiontemplate-based modeling;

Identifiers

PMID34119522
PMCPMC8254035
OpenAlexW3171039768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.