Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34119319›Full record

ArticleTherapie

Evaluation of Covid-19 vaccines: Pharmacoepidemiological aspects.

Antoine Pariente, Julien Bezin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapie. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Antoine ParienteUniversity Bordeaux, Inserm, BPH, U1219, Team Pharmacoepidemiology, 33000 Bordeaux, France; CHU de Bordeaux, pôle de santé publique, service de pharmacologie médicale, unité de pharmaco-épidémiologie et bon usage du médicament, 33000 Bordeaux, France. Electronic address: antoine.pariente@u-bordeaux.fr.
Julien BezinUniversity Bordeaux, Inserm, BPH, U1219, Team Pharmacoepidemiology, 33000 Bordeaux, France; CHU de Bordeaux, pôle de santé publique, service de pharmacologie médicale, unité de pharmaco-épidémiologie et bon usage du médicament, 33000 Bordeaux, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The marketing authorization granted to SARS-Cov-2 vaccines was accompanied by reinforced safety monitoring plans. These plans' implementation was part of the usual logic of post-marketing surveillance of new and innovative health products. It was especially adapted to the context of post-marketing monitoring of drugs developed according to the usual scientific quality standards but in an accelerated schedule. In Europe, the reinforced surveillance system relies on the complementary strengths of pharmacovigilance and pharmacoepidemiology. If the performances of pharmacovigilance monitoring are incomparable for the detection of safety signals relating to rare events of atypical presentation, it needs to be completed with pharmacoepidemiology activities for more common events, either multifactorial or frequently classified as idiopathic. The pharmacoepidemiological monitoring developed in Europe was elaborated before the first SARS-Cov-2 vaccines where marketed, taking into account the lessons learned from the vaccination campaign against 2009 A (H1N1) influenza. It includes numerous academic studies as well as studies performed within vaccines risk management plans. In terms of safety, those defined a priori mostly concerns a list of pre-established health events of specific interest. Aside of these planned activities, ad-hoc studies will be latter developed on purpose to investigate safety signals or potential signals that could be identified as the result of pharmacovigilance activities. Aside of these regulated activities, as for today, very few studies have been published regarding SARS-Cov-2 vaccines; most of the existing consist in preprints that should be considered with caution. Pharmacoepidemiology of vaccines is thought to allow near-real time monitoring that needs sufficient time to provide with valid results. In the constant urge for information that accompanies COVID-related science, it is important not to make haste the enemy of speed and to let pharmacoepidemiology provides with what it is expected to do: rock-solid scientific information contributing to evidence-based decision-making.

Indexed as

COVID-19 VaccinesImmunization ProgramsPharmacoepidemiologyCOVID-19EuropeHumansInfluenza A Virus, H1N1 SubtypeInfluenza VaccinesSARS-CoV-2COVID-19 VaccinesInfluenza VaccinesDrug safetyPharmacoepidemiologySARS-CoV-2VaccinationVaccine

Identifiers

PMID34119319
PMCPMC8103672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.