ArticleLancet (London, England)2021
Inclusion and diversity in the PRINCIPLE trial.
Article in Lancet (London, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A rapid review of community engagement and informed consent processes for adaptive platform trials and alternative design trials for public health emergencies.Wellcome open research · 2023Pooled it
- Ivermectin for COVID-19 in adults in the community (PRINCIPLE): An open, randomised, controlled, adaptive platform trial of short- and longer-term outcomes.The Journal of infection · 2024Trial
- Colchicine for COVID-19 in the community (PRINCIPLE): a randomised, controlled, adaptive platform trial.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2022Trial
- Survey to inform personalised prescribing in a British South Asian community: pharmacogenomics and traditional medicine use.BMC medicine · 2026Article
- Precision Prevention Studies: A Targeted Approach to Cancer Prevention.Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2025Review
- Democratising clinical trials research to strengthen primary health care.The Lancet. Global health · 2025Review
- Democratising the design and delivery of large-scale randomised, controlled clinical trials in primary care: A personal view.The European journal of general practice · 2024Article
- Patient's and Consultant's Views and Perceptions on Switching from an Originator Biologic to Biosimilar Medication: A Qualitative Study.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Additional consensus recommendations for conducting complex innovative trials of oncology agents: a post-pandemic perspective.British journal of cancer · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.