Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34118896›Full record

Observational studyBMC musculoskeletal disorders2021

Measuring recovery after open lower limb fractures: combined objective functional tests and global perceived recovery outperform narrower metrics and a standard generic patient reported outcome measure.

Ian Pallister, Gregory Jack Handley, Sharon Maggs, Ann-Marie Davies, Amanda Kyle, Owen Bodger, Hywel Dafydd

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 50% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Patient-Perceived Time to Recovery After Carpal Tunnel Release.Journal of hand surgery global online · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ian PallisterDepartment of Trauma & Orthopaedics, Swansea University Medical School, c/o Morriston Hospital, Swansea, SA6 6NL, UK. ian.pallister@wales.nhs.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0570-1012
Gregory Jack HandleyDepartment of Surgery, Morriston Hospital, Swansea, UK.
Sharon MaggsDepartment of Physiotherapy, Morriston Hospital, Swansea, UK.
Ann-Marie DaviesDepartment of Physiotherapy, Morriston Hospital, Swansea, UK.
Amanda KyleDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Morriston Hospital, Swansea, UK.
Owen BodgerSenior Lecturer Statistician, Swansea University Medical School, Swansea, UK.
Hywel DafyddDepartment of Wales Centre for Burns and Plastic Surgery, Morriston Hospital, Swansea, UK.
Morriston Hospital · GBSwansea University · GB

Funding

AO Foundation (S-10-75T)Osteosynthesis and Trauma Care Foundation (2011-IPRT)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOpen lower limb fractures are serious injuries requiring combined ortho-plastic surgery and have significantly worse outcomes than similar closed fractures. There is little objective published data to determine which functional outcome measures best reflect progress or completeness of physical recovery. Our hypothesis was that objective measures combining strength, mobility and balance would better reflect recovery than isolated parameters (e.g. range of motion ROM) and would compare well to patients' perceived recovery.

methodsAdult open lower limb fracture patients were reviewed 6 and 12 weeks, 6, 9 and 12 months post-injury. The mechanism, injury pattern, age, gender and treatment were recorded. Isolated parameter objective functional outcome measures (OFOMs) (ROM and MRC strength grade) were compared to combined OFOMs (timed up and go, comfortable gait speed and fast gait speed, Edgren Side Step Test (TUAG, CGS, FGS, ESST) and Single Leg balance. Patient reported outcomes were recorded (Global Perceived Effect (GPE) score and Disability Rating Index (DRI)). Statistical analysis used non-parametric tests (e.g. Spearman correlation) compared each with time since injury.

resultsSixty-eight patients (54 male) with a median age of 45(20-75) years. Of the 19 isolated OFOMs, only knee flexion and ankle plantar flexion ROM and strength improved with time (Spearman correlation p = 0.042, 0.008, 0.032, 0.036 respectively). TUAG, ESST, CGS, FGS and GPE scores showed significant improvement (Spearman correlation p < 0.001). Patients' estimation of recovery paralleled these measures (Spearman correlation p < 0.001) with all but 2 patients achieving the minimum clinical important difference in DRI by 12 months compared to baseline. However, the GPE score had a higher proportion of improving responses than DRI at each time-point. DISCUSSION: Functional recovery is a key determinant in patients returning to work, providing for themselves and their family or resuming independent living for older patients. This study has demonstrated time-related improvements in combined OFOMs measuring mobility, strength, agility and balance paralleling patients' perception of recovery in the 12 months after open lower limb fractures. Over the same time-frame, the simple GPE score compared favourably with the DRI. Such parameters could become part of a defined core outcomes set. Focussing rehabilitation towards these combined OFOMs may help hasten recovery.

trial registrationSouth West Wales REC 06/WMW02/10).

Indexed as

BenchmarkingFractures, OpenAdultAgedHumansLower ExtremityMaleMiddle AgedPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresRange of Motion, ArticularWalesComplicationsFunctionOpen lower limb fracturesOutcomeRecoveryRehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID34118896
PMCPMC8199836
OpenAlexW3172790186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.