Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34118573›Full record

ArticleHealth & place2021

The impact of school exclusion zone planning guidance on the number and type of food outlets in an English local authority: A longitudinal analysis.

Heather Brown, Scott Kirkman, Viviana Albani, Louis Goffe, Nasima Akhter, Bruce Hollingsworth, Stephanie von Hinke, Amelia Lake

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health & place, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Interventions to prevent obesity in children aged 12 to 18 years old.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Heather BrownSenior Lecturer in Health Economics, Newcastle University Population Health Sciences Institute, UK. Electronic address: heather.brown@newcastle.ac.uk.
Scott KirkmanNewcastle University Population Health Sciences Institute, UK. Electronic address: s.b.kirkman@newcastle.ac.uk.
Viviana AlbaniNewcastle University Population Health Sciences Institute, UK. Electronic address: Viviana.albani@newcastle.ac.uk.
Louis GoffeNewcastle University Population Health Sciences Institute, UK. Electronic address: louis.goffe@newcastle.ac.uk.
Nasima AkhterDurham University Department of Anthropology, UK. Electronic address: nasima.akhter@durham.ac.uk.
Bruce HollingsworthProfessor of Health Economics, Lancaster University Health Economics at Lancaster, UK. Electronic address: b.hollingsworth@lancaster.ac.uk.
Stephanie von HinkeProfessor of Economics, Bristol University School of Economics, UK. Electronic address: s.vonhinke@bristol.ac.uk.
Amelia LakeProfessor of Public Health Nutrition, Teesside University SHLS Allied Health Professions, Centre for Public Health, UK. Electronic address: Amelia.Lake@tees.ac.uk.

Funding

Department of Health PD-SPH-2015Medical Research Council G1002345Medical Research Council MR/K02325X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of planning policy to manage and create a healthy food environment has become a popular policy tool for local governments in England. To date there has been no evaluation of their short-term impact on the built environment. We assess if planning guidance restricting new fast food outlets within 400 m of a secondary school, influences the food environment in the local authority of Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK. We have administrative data on all food outlets in Newcastle 3 years pre-intervention 2012-2015, the intervention year 2016, and three years' post-intervention 2016-2019. We employ a difference-in-difference approach comparing postcodes within the school fast food outlet exclusion zone to those outside the fast-food exclusion zones. In the short term (3 years), planning guidance to limit the number of new fast-food outlets in a school exclusion zone did not have a statistically significant impact on the food environment when compared with a control zone.

Indexed as

Fast FoodsResidence CharacteristicsEnvironmentFood SupplyHumansRestaurantsSchoolsDifference-in-differenceEvaluationFood environmentPlanning guidanceUK

Identifiers

PMID34118573
PMCPMC8361782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.