ArticleBiomedical journal2022
Implementation of fecal microbiota transplantation in a medical center for recurrent or refractory Clostridioides difficile infection and report of preliminary outcome.
Article in Biomedical journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.
- Marine prebiotics mediate decolonization of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from gut by inhibiting secreted virulence factor interactions with mucins and enriching Bacteroides population.Journal of biomedical science · 2023Article
- Fecal microbiota transplantation for treatment of refractory or recurrentFrontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Management of Clostridioides difficile infection in adults and challenges in clinical practice: review and comparison of current IDSA/SHEA, ESCMID and ASID guidelines.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2022Review
- A finger in every pie - The versatility of chemokines.Biomedical journal · 2022Article
- Current and future applications of fecal microbiota transplantation for children.Biomedical journal · 2022Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has been shown to highly effective in the treatment of recurrent or refractory Clostridioides difficile infection (rCDI) in many countries of the world. Not until 2018, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taiwan approved the application of FMT for rCDI under a special law. The study reported the first implementation of the technology in the medical center in Taiwan and the preliminary outcome.
methodsFMT was used to treat patients with rCDI in Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. FMT was delivered by gastroenterologists using colonoscope. Strict donor screening was performed according to the guidelines. We followed up the clinical course of patients after FMT. 16S rRNA sequencing of fecal samples for donor, and also recipient before and after FMT was carried out.
resultsFrom September 2018 to June 2020, 39 patients with rCDI received FMT, with a successful rate of 89.7%. Two patients died due to causes unrelated to FMT, and two other cases showed no clinical improvement after the procedure. High school and college students showed the best pass rate during donor screening. The presence of multi-drug resistant pathogen was the most common cause for screening failure. We demonstrated in a case the use of rRNA sequencing as a biomarker indicating for the improvement of dysbiosis in a patient after FMT.
conclusionsFMT was successfully implemented in a medical center in Taiwan and showed a comparable successful rate in treating rCDI, compared to other countries. Safety remains the most important issue when applying FMT in the clinical setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.