ArticleBiomedical journal2022
Short-term and long-term psychological impact and quality of life of patients undergoing orthognathic surgery.
Article in Biomedical journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Anatomical References for the Study of 3D Facial Photographs: A Scoping Review and Proposed Preliminary Framework for Comprehensive Facial Evaluation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Somatic and psychiatric aspects of complications outside the surgical area in orthognathic surgery: A retrospective study of 429 patients.Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal · 2026Article
- Treatment outcomes, symptoms of anxiety and depression, and satisfaction with life after orthognathic surgery.Frontiers in oral health · 2026Article
- Impact of Patients' Preoperative Psychological Baseline on Postoperative Voice and Quality of Life Following Pharyngo-Laryngectomy with Anterolateral Thigh Flap Reconstruction: A Preliminary Study.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Article
- Sleep disorders in individuals with dentofacial deformities: a preliminary study on the relationship with sex and serotonin levels.Oral and maxillofacial surgery · 2025Article
- Male and Female Discrepancies in Anxiety, Depressive Symptoms, and Coping Strategies among Orthognathic Patients: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Reflection on patients' experience with orthodontic appliances wear and its impact on oral health related quality of life: observational comparative study.BMC oral health · 2023Observational
- Early Treatment of Unilateral Condylar Hyperplasia in Adolescents: Preliminary Results.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Mapping the terrain: a scoping review of empirical studies on the big five personality traits and QoL in China.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- A finger in every pie - The versatility of chemokines.Biomedical journal · 2022Article
- Sleep, Distressed Appearance, and Quality of Life Relate to Satisfaction with Orthognathic Surgery.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Patients' satisfaction after orthognathic surgery among the Saudi population in the Eastern Province: A cross-sectional study.Journal of oral biology and craniofacial researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOrthognathic Surgery (OGS) is a surgery for patients with dento-facial deformity but not all patients are satisfied with its outcome. The purpose of this study is to find out the short-term and long-term psychological impact and quality-of-life of OGS.
methods77 participants receiving OGS and 32 age and gender-matched controls were enrolled. The data of questionnaires were collected before OGS, one month and 9 months after OGS, including short form of the Derriford-Appearance-Scale (DAS-24), Big-Five-Inventory (BFI), Hospital-Anxiety-and-Depression-Scale (HADS), Pittsburgh-sleep-quality-index (PSQI), and 36-Item Short-Form-Health-Survey (SF-36). Variables were presented as mean ± standard deviation or frequency. Paired t-test, ANOVA and MANOVA were used to evaluate the pre-and post-surgery data.
resultsShort-term and long-term satisfaction of OGS was high. Before OGS, BFI showed the extraversion had significant difference between the male and female OGS subgroups. Several domains of DAS-24 were significantly different between the OGS and the control groups. Both groups had no significant difference in PSQI, HADS and SF-36, except sleep-efficiency. After OGS, many domains of DAS-24 were significantly improved and the improvement persisted to 9 months later. Sleep-latency, physical-function, role-limitations-due-to-physical-health and social-functioning exacerbated after OGS. Sleep-latency, physical-function, and social-functioning were improved 9 months after OGS, but sleep-efficiency and role-limitations-due-to-physical-health were still significantly worse than controls.
conclusionPeople received OGS for unfavorable appearance and the surgery could decrease their distress of appearance and impact to their daily living. Through long-term assessment, we should pay attention to sleep problems and role-limitations-due-to-physical-health after OGS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.