ReviewProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2021
From Kuru to Alzheimer: A personal outlook.
Review in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Beyond Misfolding: A New Paradigm for the Relationship Between Protein Folding and Aggregation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Eraldo Antonini Lectures, 1983-2019.Biology direct · 2022Article
- Multi-eGO: An in silico lens to look into protein aggregation kinetics at atomic resolution.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022Article
- An Outlook on the Complexity of Protein Morphogenesis in Health and Disease.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2022Review
- Amyloid Formation by Globular Proteins: The Need to Narrow the Gap BetweenFrontiers in molecular biosciences · 2022Review
- From Kuru to Alzheimer: A personal outlook.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2021Review
- microRNA-146a-5p, Neurotropic Viral Infection and Prion Disease (PrD).International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Seventy years ago, we learned from Chris Anfinsen that the stereochemical code necessary to fold a protein is embedded into its amino acid sequence. In water, protein morphogenesis is a spontaneous reversible process leading from an ensemble of disordered structures to the ordered functionally competent protein; conforming to Aristotle's definition of substance, the synolon of matter and form. The overall process of folding is generally consistent with a two state transition between the native and the denatured protein: not only the denatured state is an ensemble of several structures, but also the native protein populates distinct functionally relevant conformational (sub)states. This two-state view should be revised, given that any globular protein can populate a peculiar third state called amyloid, characterized by an overall architecture that at variance with the native state, is by-and-large independent of the primary structure. In a nut shell, we should accept that beside the folded and unfolded states, any protein can populate a third state called amyloid which gained center stage being the hallmark of incurable neurodegenerative disorders, such as Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases as well as others. These fatal diseases are characterized by clear-cut clinical differences, yet display some commonalities such as the presence in the brain of amyloid deposits constituted by one misfolded protein specific for each disease. Some aspects of this complex problem are summarized here as an excursus from the prion's fibrils observed in the brain of aborigines who died of Kuru to the amyloid detectable in the cortex of Alzheimer's patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.