ArticleEJNMMI research2021
Performance of nanoScan PET/CT and PET/MR for quantitative imaging of
Article in EJNMMI research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Quantitative Preclinical Imaging as a Metrological Framework: Reproducibility, Validation, and Translational Maturity.Journal of imaging · 2026Review
- Article
- Unveiling Another Dimension: Advanced Visualization of Cancer Invasion and Metastasis via Micro-CT Imaging.Cancers · 2025Article
- Optimisation of Animal Handing and Timing of 2-deoxy-2-[Molecular imaging and biology · 2024Article
- Cardioprotective effect of S-adenosyl L-methionine due to antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties on isoproterenol-induced chronic heart failure in Wistar rats.Indian journal of pharmacology · 2024Article
- Combining PET and Compton imaging with edge-on CZT detectors for enhanced diagnostic capabilities.Advances in radiotherapy & nuclear medicine · 2024Article
- Evaluation of the Therapeutical Effect of Matricaria Chamomilla Extract vs. Galantamine on Animal Model Memory and Behavior Using 18F-FDG PET/MRI.Current issues in molecular biology · 2024Article
- Application ofEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023Article
- Performance evaluation of a preclinical SPECT/CT system for multi-animal and multi-isotope quantitative experiments.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- A guideline proposal for mice preparation and care inEJNMMI research · 2022Review
- Development and comparison of threeEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2022Article
- Longitudinal evaluation of five nasopharyngeal carcinoma animal models on the microPET/MR platform.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThe assessment of ex vivo biodistribution is the preferred method for quantification of radiotracers biodistribution in preclinical models, but is not in line with current ethics on animal research. PET imaging allows for noninvasive longitudinal evaluation of tracer distribution in the same animals, but systemic comparison with ex vivo biodistribution is lacking. Our aim was to evaluate the potential of preclinical PET imaging for accurate tracer quantification, especially in tumor models.
methodsNEMA NU 4-2008 phantoms were filled with
resultsIn phantoms, the highest recovery coefficient, thus the smallest partial volume effect, was obtained with
conclusionsOur study suggests that PET quantification of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.