Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34117879›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2021

Improving sequence-based modeling of protein families using secondary-structure quality assessment.

Cyril Malbranke, David Bikard, Simona Cocco, Rémi Monasson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Cyril MalbrankeLaboratory of Physics of the Ecole Normale Superieure, PSL Research, CNRS UMR 8023, Sorbonne Université, Université de Paris, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4545-0801
David BikardSynthetic Biology, Microbiology Department, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France.
Simona CoccoLaboratory of Physics of the Ecole Normale Superieure, PSL Research, CNRS UMR 8023, Sorbonne Université, Université de Paris, Paris, France.
Rémi MonassonLaboratory of Physics of the Ecole Normale Superieure, PSL Research, CNRS UMR 8023, Sorbonne Université, Université de Paris, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationModeling of protein family sequence distribution from homologous sequence data recently received considerable attention, in particular for structure and function predictions, as well as for protein design. In particular, direct coupling analysis, a method to infer effective pairwise interactions between residues, was shown to capture important structural constraints and to successfully generate functional protein sequences. Building on this and other graphical models, we introduce a new framework to assess the quality of the secondary structures of the generated sequences with respect to reference structures for the family.

resultsWe introduce two scoring functions characterizing the likeliness of the secondary structure of a protein sequence to match a reference structure, called Dot Product and Pattern Matching. We test these scores on published experimental protein mutagenesis and design dataset, and show improvement in the detection of nonfunctional sequences. We also show that use of these scores help rejecting nonfunctional sequences generated by graphical models (Restricted Boltzmann Machines) learned from homologous sequence alignments. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Data and code available at https://github.com/CyrilMa/ssqa. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

ProteinsAmino Acid SequenceMutagenesisProtein Structure, SecondarySequence AlignmentProteins

Identifiers

PMID34117879
PMCPMC9502231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.