ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2021
Improving sequence-based modeling of protein families using secondary-structure quality assessment.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comprehensive Evolutionary and Structural Analysis of the H5N1 Clade 2.4.3.4b Influenza a Virus Based on the Sequences and Data Mining of the Hemagglutinin, Nucleoprotein and Neuraminidase Genes Across Multiple Hosts.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Towards parsimonious generative modeling of RNA families.Nucleic acids research · 2024Article
- Computational design of novel Cas9 PAM-interacting domains using evolution-based modelling and structural quality assessment.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Article
- Funneling modulatory peptide design with generative models: Discovery and characterization of disruptors of calcineurin protein-protein interactions.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
motivationModeling of protein family sequence distribution from homologous sequence data recently received considerable attention, in particular for structure and function predictions, as well as for protein design. In particular, direct coupling analysis, a method to infer effective pairwise interactions between residues, was shown to capture important structural constraints and to successfully generate functional protein sequences. Building on this and other graphical models, we introduce a new framework to assess the quality of the secondary structures of the generated sequences with respect to reference structures for the family.
resultsWe introduce two scoring functions characterizing the likeliness of the secondary structure of a protein sequence to match a reference structure, called Dot Product and Pattern Matching. We test these scores on published experimental protein mutagenesis and design dataset, and show improvement in the detection of nonfunctional sequences. We also show that use of these scores help rejecting nonfunctional sequences generated by graphical models (Restricted Boltzmann Machines) learned from homologous sequence alignments. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Data and code available at https://github.com/CyrilMa/ssqa. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.