Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34117715›Full record

ReviewBasic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology2022

Boosting the oral bioavailability of anticancer drugs through intentional drug-drug interactions.

Eric D Eisenmann, Zahra Talebi, Alex Sparreboom, Sharyn D Baker

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Basic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eric D EisenmannDivision of Pharmaceutics and Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1176-675X
Zahra TalebiDivision of Pharmaceutics and Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9166-5160
Alex SparreboomDivision of Pharmaceutics and Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2660-6644
Sharyn D BakerDivision of Pharmaceutics and Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3062-3252
The Ohio State University · US

Funding

The Chesapeake-Ohio Pharmacokinetics Core for The ETCTNU24CA247648 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Jan Hendrik Beumer, Mitch A Phelps · 2020 to 2026
$3.6M
Tyrosine kinase inhibitors for the treatment of childhood AMLR01CA138744 · NCI · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI BAKER, SHARYN D · 2010 to 2019
$3.3M
(9) Therapeutic strategies to mitigate toxicities of platinum-based therapeuticsR01CA215802 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI PABLA, NAVJOT, SPARREBOOM, ALEXANDER · 2017 to 2021
$2.5M
Intentional Modulation of Ibrutinib Pharmacokinetics through CYP3A InhibitionF31CA254151 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI EISENMANN, ERIC DANIEL · 2020 to 2021
$49k
NCI NIH HHS F31 CA254151NCI NIH HHS F31CA254151NCI NIH HHS R01 CA138744NCI NIH HHS R01CA138744NCI NIH HHS R01 CA215802NCI NIH HHS R01CA215802NCI NIH HHS U24 CA247648
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oral anticancer drugs suffer from significant variability in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics partially due to limited bioavailability. The limited bioavailability of anticancer drugs is due to both pharmaceutical limitations and physiological barriers. Pharmacokinetic boosting is a strategy to enhance the oral bioavailability of a therapeutic drug by inhibiting physiological barriers through an intentional drug-drug interaction (DDI). This type of strategy has proven effective across several therapeutic indications including anticancer treatment. Pharmacokinetic boosting could improve anticancer drugs lacking or with otherwise unacceptable oral formulations through logistic, economic, pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic benefits. Despite these benefits, pharmacokinetic boosting strategies could result in unintended DDIs and are only likely to benefit a limited number of targets. Highlighting this concern, pharmacokinetic boosting has mixed results depending on the boosted drug. While pharmacokinetic boosting did not significantly improve certain drugs, it has resulted in the commercial approval of boosted oral formulations for other drugs. Pharmacokinetic boosting to improve oral anticancer therapy is an expanding area of research that is likely to improve treatment options for cancer patients.

Indexed as

Drug InteractionsAdministration, OralAntineoplastic AgentsBiological AvailabilityHumansNeoplasmsAntineoplastic Agentsanticancerboostingcancer chemotherapydrug-drug interactionsdrug-metabolising enzymesdrug transporterspharmacokinetics

Identifiers

PMID34117715
PMCPMC8665934
OpenAlexW3168471555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.