Trial reportIndian journal of pediatrics2022
Early Total Versus Gradually Advanced Enteral Nutrition in Stable Very-Low-Birth-Weight Preterm Neonates: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.
Trial report in Indian journal of pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Early full or near-full enteral feeding in clinically stable preterm infants across healthcare settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Delayed introduction of progressive enteral feeds to prevent necrotising enterocolitis in very low birth weight infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022Pooled it
- Early total enteral feeding versus conventional incremental feeding in preterm infants weighing 1000-1250 g: a single-center open-label randomized controlled trial.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Trial
- Early exclusive enteral feeding in 30-33 weeks gestation infants: a randomized controlled trial.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2025Trial
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo assess whether early total enteral nutrition (80 mL/kg/d) started on day 1 of life in hemodynamically stable preterm very-low-birth-weight (VLBW) neonates with the rapid advancement of feeds (20 mL/kg/d) help in the earlier achievement of full feeds (180 mL/kg/d).
methodsEarly total enteral nutrition (intervention) group feeding was started with 80 mL/kg/d on the first day in all hemodynamically stable neonates admitted with birth weight of 1000-1499 grams, born at 29-33 wk of gestation as determined by first-trimester ultrasonography (USG) or expanded New Ballard Score (NBS) and was advanced by 20 mL/kg/d until maximum feeds of 180 mL/kg/d were achieved; while in control group feeding was started with 30 mL/kg/d on the first day and was advanced by 20 mL/kg/d until maximum feeds were achieved. Primary outcome measure was time taken to achieve full feeds; secondary outcomes were duration of hospital stay, necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), time to regain birth weight, duration of antibiotics, and death.
resultsSixty VLBW neonates (1000-1499 g) with comparable baseline demographics were randomized within 24 h of admission to two groups. Early total enteral nutrition intervention group (group I, n = 31) achieved the target of full enteral nutrition at median 6 d; IQR: 0 to 7.8 d, a significantly shorter time compared to the controls (n = 29) (median 10 d; IQR: 9 to 11.0 d; p = < 0.05).
conclusionEarly total enteral nutrition started from the first day of life results in significantly less time to achieve full feeds in hemodynamically stable preterm and VLBW infants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.