Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34117602›Full record

ArticleOncology and therapy2021

Crizotinib Versus Conventional Chemotherapy in First-Line Treatment for ALK-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Barbara D Cruz, Mariana M Barbosa, Lucas L Torres, Pamela S Azevedo, Vânia E A Silva, Brian Godman, Juliana Alvares-Teodoro

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology and therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. The overall survival benefit in Chinese ALKJournal of thoracic disease · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Barbara D CruzPrograma de Pós-Graduação Em Medicamentos E Assistência Farmacêutica, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil. bdelanocruz@yahoo.com.br.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4106-7768
Mariana M BarbosaCâmara de Regulação Do Mercado de Medicamentos (CMED), Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária (ANVISA), Governo Federal, Brasília, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1465-9167
Lucas L TorresPrograma de Pós-Graduação Em Medicamentos E Assistência Farmacêutica, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7770-4597
Pamela S AzevedoPrograma de Pós-Graduação Em Medicamentos E Assistência Farmacêutica, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1947-6290
Vânia E A SilvaPontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais, PUC Minas, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0345-8522
Brian GodmanStrathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, G4 0RE, UK.
Juliana Alvares-TeodoroPrograma de Pós-Graduação Em Medicamentos E Assistência Farmacêutica, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0210-0721
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BRGoverno do Distrito Federal · BRPontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais · BRUniversity of Strathclyde · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLung cancer is the most frequently diagnosed type of cancer and the main cause of death from malignant neoplasms worldwide. One of the most recent discoveries in the context of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was the mutation of the anaplastic lymphoma kinase receptor (ALK). This genetic alteration is found in approximately 2-5% of NSCLC patients, and crizotinib was the first targeted therapy discovered for its first-line treatment.

objectiveTo conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the magnitude of the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) from using crizotinib as treatment compared to traditional chemotherapy to guide future decision making.

methodsPRISMA and Cochrane recommendations were followed using the findings based on studies published in the main international electronic databases. Selection criteria included the following: randomized clinical trials (RCT) or cohort studies that had assessed the efficacy and effectiveness of crizotinib as monotherapy in patients with NSCLC with ALK fusions.

resultsFrom 2504 publications identified in the literature, only eight publications referring to seven studies met the selection criteria, with high heterogeneity identified between the studies. Overall, there was a significant gain in PFS (HR 0.38; 95% CI 0.30-0.49; p < 0.00001); however, there was no significant gain in OS (HR 0.68; 95% CI 0.43-1.08; p = 0.10).

conclusionThe study highlighted and confirmed that treatment with crizotinib led to clinical improvement in PFS among patients with advanced NSCLC with ALK fusion, as previously reported. However, there was no increase in overall survival in patients with NSCLC with genetic alterations of ALK. This must be considered when reviewing and funding treatments for NSCLC patients with this mutation.

Indexed as

Anaplastic lymphoma kinaseCrizotinibEffectivenessEfficacyLung cancerSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID34117602
PMCPMC8594233
OpenAlexW3167658890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.