Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34117520›Full record

ReviewPediatric radiology2021

Pediatric contrast-enhanced ultrasound: shedding light on the pursuit of approval in the United States.

Kassa Darge, Susan J Back, Dorothy I Bulas, Steven B Feinstein, Aikaterini Ntoulia, Frank M Volberg, Stephanie R Wilson, M Beth McCarville

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Kassa DargeDepartment of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3401 Civic Center Blvd., Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA. darge@chop.edu.
Susan J BackDepartment of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3401 Civic Center Blvd., Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Dorothy I BulasDivision of Diagnostic Imaging and Radiology, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.
Steven B FeinsteinDepartment of Internal Medicine, Rush Medical College, Chicago, IL, USA.
Aikaterini NtouliaDepartment of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3401 Civic Center Blvd., Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9853-4873
Frank M VolbergDepartment of Radiology and Medical Imaging, University of Virginia Children's Hospital, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Stephanie R WilsonDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Radiology and Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
M Beth McCarvilleDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA.
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia · USChildren's National · USRush University Medical Center · USSt. Jude Children's Research Hospital · USUniversity of Calgary · CAUniversity of Virginia Children's Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For two decades, pediatric contrast US has been well accepted throughout Europe and other parts of the world outside the United States because of its high diagnostic efficacy and extremely favorable safety profile. This includes intravenous (IV) administration, contrast-enhanced US (CEUS) and the intravesical application, contrast-enhanced voiding urosonography (ceVUS). However, the breakthrough for pediatric contrast US in the United States did not come until 2016, when the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the first pediatric indication for a US contrast agent. This initial approval covered the use of Lumason (Bracco Diagnostics, Monroe Township, NJ) for the evaluation of focal liver lesions via IV administration in children. A second pediatric indication followed shortly thereafter, when the FDA extended the use of Lumason for assessing known or suspected vesicoureteral reflux via intravesical application in children. Both initial pediatric approvals were granted without prospective pediatric clinical trials, based instead on published literature describing favorable safety and efficacy in children. Three years later, in 2019, the FDA approved Lumason for pediatric echocardiography following a clinical trial involving a total of 12 subjects at 2 sites. The story of how we achieved these FDA approvals spans more than a decade and involves the extraordinary dedication of two professional societies, namely the International Contrast Ultrasound Society (ICUS) and the Society for Pediatric Radiology (SPR). Credit also must be given to the FDA staff for their commitment to the welfare of children and their openness to compelling evidence that contrast US is a safe, reliable, radiation-free imaging option for our pediatric patients. Understanding the history of this approval process will impact the practical application of US contrast agents, particularly when expanding off-label indications in the pediatric population. This article describes the background of the FDA's approval of pediatric contrast US applications to better illuminate the potential pathways to approvals of future indications.

Indexed as

Contrast MediaVesico-Ureteral RefluxChildHumansUltrasonographyUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationUrinationContrast MediaChildrenDrug approvalInternational Contrast Ultrasound SocietyLegislationLumasonSociety for Pediatric RadiologyUltrasoundUltrasound contrast agentUnited States Food and Drug Administration

Identifiers

PMID34117520
OpenAlexW3167658808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.