Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34117428›Full record

ArticleBritish dental journal2021

Retention: taking a more active role.

Sepideh Torkan, Fiona Firth, Padhraig S Fleming, Neal D Kravitz, Mauro Farella, Greg J Huang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in British dental journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Sepideh TorkanDepartment of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Washington, Health Sciences Centre, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Fiona FirthDiscipline of Orthodontics, Department of Oral Sciences and Sir John Walsh Research Institute, University of Otago, New Zealand. fiona.firth@otago.ac.nz.
Padhraig S FlemingInstitute of Dentistry, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Neal D KravitzPrivate Practice of Orthodontics in South Riding, Virginia, USA.
Mauro FarellaDiscipline of Orthodontics, Department of Oral Sciences and Sir John Walsh Research Institute, University of Otago, New Zealand.
Greg J HuangDepartment of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Washington, Health Sciences Centre, Seattle, Washington, USA.
University of Otago · NZUniversity of Washington · USQueen Mary University of London · GBRocky Mountain Orthodontics (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Retention may be particularly challenging after the correction of specific malocclusion features, such as tooth rotations, open bite and expansion, which are all inherently unstable. In this article, some indications for active retention are reviewed by highlighting a variety of clinical techniques and appliances. Active retention is discussed in relation to preservation of tooth alignment and in the three planes of space: sagittal, vertical and transverse. In some situations, an active retention regimen may be helpful to minimise or counteract relapse after orthodontic treatment and to improve patient satisfaction during the typically lengthy post-treatment period.

Indexed as

MalocclusionOpen BiteCephalometryHumansIncisorMandibleTooth Movement Techniques

Identifiers

PMID34117428
OpenAlexW3169757247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.