Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34117390›Full record

ReviewEye (London, England)2021

A review of robotic surgical training: establishing a curriculum and credentialing process in ophthalmology.

Bonnie He, Marc D de Smet, Mohit Sodhi, Mahyar Etminan, David Maberley

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Eye (London, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Robotising vitreoretinal surgeries.Eye (London, England) · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Robotic Assistance for Intraocular Microsurgery: Challenges and Perspectives.Proceedings of the IEEE. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Bonnie HeDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3728-4436
Marc D de SmetDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Leiden, Leiden, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9217-5603
Mohit SodhiDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6583-5277
Mahyar EtminanDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
David MaberleyDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. david.maberley@ubc.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ophthalmic surgery requires a highly dexterous and precise surgical approach to work within the small confines of the eye, and the use of robotics offers numerous potential advantages to current surgical techniques. However, there is a lag in the development of a comprehensive training and credentialing system for robotic eye surgery, and certification of robotic skills proficiency relies heavily on industry leadership. We conducted a literature review on the curricular elements of established robotics training programs as well as privileging guidelines from various institutions to outline key components in training and credentialing robotic surgeons for ophthalmic surgeries. Based on our literature review and informal discussions between the authors and other robotic ophthalmic experts, we recommend that the overall training framework for robotic ophthalmic trainees proceeds in a stepwise, competency-based manner from didactic learning, to simulation exercises, to finally operative experiences. Nontechnical skills such as device troubleshooting and interprofessional teamwork should also be formally taught and evaluated. In addition, we have developed an assessment tool based on validated global rating scales for surgical skills that may be used to monitor the progress of trainees. Finally, we propose a graduating model for granting privileges to robotic surgeons. Further work will need to be undertaken to assess the feasibility, efficacy and integrity of the training curriculum and credentialing practices for robotic ophthalmic surgery.

Indexed as

OphthalmologyRobotic Surgical ProceduresClinical CompetenceCredentialingCurriculumHumans

Identifiers

PMID34117390
PMCPMC8602368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.