Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34117381›Full record

ReviewEye (London, England)2021

Non-invasive electrophysiology in glaucoma, structure and function-a review.

Khaldoon O Al-Nosairy, Michael B Hoffmann, Michael Bach

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Eye (London, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Slope between positive and negative ERG components in patients with open-angle glaucoma.Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Khaldoon O Al-NosairyDepartment of Ophthalmology, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany.
Michael B HoffmannDepartment of Ophthalmology, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany.
Michael BachFaculty of Medicine, Eye Center, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany. michael.bach@uni-freiburg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2028-535X
Center for Behavioral Brain Sciences · DEOtto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg · DEUniversity of Freiburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glaucoma, its early diagnosis, and monitoring of interventions remain an ongoing challenge. We here review developments in functional assessment and its relation to morphology, evaluating recent insights in electrophysiology in glaucoma and highlighting how glaucoma research and diagnostics benefit from combined approaches of OCT and electrophysiological investigations. After concise overviews of OCT and non-invasive electrophysiology in glaucoma, we evaluate commonalities and complementarities of OCT and electrophysiology for our understanding of glaucoma. As a specific topic, the dynamic range (floor effects) of the various techniques is discussed.

Indexed as

GlaucomaEarly DiagnosisElectrophysiologyHumansTomography, Optical Coherence

Identifiers

PMID34117381
PMCPMC8376952
OpenAlexW3169306115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.