Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34117349›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2021

LPMO-oxidized cellulose oligosaccharides evoke immunity in Arabidopsis conferring resistance towards necrotrophic fungus B. cinerea.

Marco Zarattini, Massimiliano Corso, Marco Antonio Kadowaki, Antonielle Monclaro, Silvia Magri, Irma Milanese, Sylvie Jolivet, Mariana Ortiz de Godoy, Christian Hermans, Mathilde Fagard and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
11.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Metabolic Aspects of Lentil-Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Marco ZarattiniPhotoBioCatalysis Unit-BioCat, Crop Production and Biostimulation Laboratory CPBL and BTL, Université libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-1884-8731
Massimiliano CorsoInstitut Jean-Pierre Bourgin, Université Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, Versailles, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3243-1660
Marco Antonio KadowakiPhotoBioCatalysis Unit-BioCat, Crop Production and Biostimulation Laboratory CPBL and BTL, Université libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Antonielle MonclaroPhotoBioCatalysis Unit-BioCat, Crop Production and Biostimulation Laboratory CPBL and BTL, Université libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Silvia MagriPhotoBioCatalysis Unit-BioCat, Crop Production and Biostimulation Laboratory CPBL and BTL, Université libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Irma MilanesePhotoBioCatalysis Unit-BioCat, Crop Production and Biostimulation Laboratory CPBL and BTL, Université libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Sylvie JolivetInstitut Jean-Pierre Bourgin, Université Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, Versailles, France.
Mariana Ortiz de GodoyPhotoBioCatalysis Unit-BioCat, Crop Production and Biostimulation Laboratory CPBL and BTL, Université libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Christian HermansCrop Production and Biostimulation Laboratory, Université libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Mathilde FagardInstitut Jean-Pierre Bourgin, Université Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, Versailles, France.
David CannellaPhotoBioCatalysis Unit-BioCat, Crop Production and Biostimulation Laboratory CPBL and BTL, Université libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium. david.cannella@ulb.be.ORCID 0000-0002-0850-1278
Université Libre de Bruxelles · BEAgroParisTech · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lytic Polysaccharide Monooxygenases (LPMOs) are powerful redox enzymes able to oxidatively cleave recalcitrant polysaccharides. Widely conserved across biological kingdoms, LPMOs of the AA9 family are deployed by phytopathogens to deconstruct cellulose polymers. In response, plants have evolved sophisticated mechanisms to sense cell wall damage and thus self-triggering Damage Triggered Immunity responses. Here, we show that Arabidopsis plants exposed to LPMO products triggered the innate immunity ultimately leading to increased resistance to the necrotrophic fungus Botrytis cinerea. We demonstrated that plants undergo a deep transcriptional reprogramming upon elicitation with AA9 derived cellulose- or cello-oligosaccharides (AA9_COS). To decipher the specific effects of native and oxidized LPMO-generated AA9_COS, a pairwise comparison with cellobiose, the smallest non-oxidized unit constituting cellulose, is presented. Moreover, we identified two leucine-rich repeat receptor-like kinases, namely STRESS INDUCED FACTOR 2 and 4, playing a crucial role in signaling the AA9_COS-dependent responses such as camalexin production. Furthermore, increased levels of ethylene, jasmonic and salicylic acid hormones, along with deposition of callose in the cell wall was observed. Collectively, our data reveal that LPMOs might play a crucial role in plant-pathogen interactions.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisBotrytisCelluloseDisease ResistanceGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, PlantMixed Function OxygenasesOligosaccharidesPlant DiseasesSordarialesCelluloseMixed Function OxygenasesOligosaccharides

Identifiers

PMID34117349
PMCPMC8196058
OpenAlexW3167301931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.