Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34117345›Full record

ReviewExperimental & molecular medicine2021

Biological importance of OCT transcription factors in reprogramming and development.

Kee-Pyo Kim, Dong Wook Han, Johnny Kim, Hans R Schöler

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Experimental & molecular medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Human stem cell-specific epigenetic signatures control transgene expression.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Gene regulatory mechanisms · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. The hope, hype and obstacles surrounding cell therapy.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Kee-Pyo Kim *Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, Max Planck Institute for Molecular Biomedicine, Röntgenstrasse 20, Münster, 48149, Germany.
Dong Wook Han *Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Large Animal models for Biomedicine, Wuyi University, Jiangmen, 529020, China.
Johnny KimDepartment of Cardiac Development and Remodeling, Max-Planck-Institute for Heart and Lung Research, Bad Nauheim, 61231, Germany. Johnny.Kim@mpi-bn.mpg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5226-5460
Hans R SchölerDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, Max Planck Institute for Molecular Biomedicine, Röntgenstrasse 20, Münster, 48149, Germany. office@mpi-muenster.mpg.de.
Max Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research · DEMax Planck Institute for Molecular Biomedicine · DEUniversity of Münster · DEWuyi University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ectopic expression of Oct4, Sox2, Klf4 and c-Myc can reprogram somatic cells into induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs). Attempts to identify genes or chemicals that can functionally replace each of these four reprogramming factors have revealed that exogenous Oct4 is not necessary for reprogramming under certain conditions or in the presence of alternative factors that can regulate endogenous Oct4 expression. For example, polycistronic expression of Sox2, Klf4 and c-Myc can elicit reprogramming by activating endogenous Oct4 expression indirectly. Experiments in which the reprogramming competence of all other Oct family members tested and also in different species have led to the decisive conclusion that Oct proteins display different reprogramming competences and species-dependent reprogramming activity despite their profound sequence conservation. We discuss the roles of the structural components of Oct proteins in reprogramming and how donor cell epigenomes endow Oct proteins with different reprogramming competences.

Indexed as

Cellular ReprogrammingInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsCell DifferentiationCells, CulturedFibroblastsKruppel-Like Transcription FactorsOctamer Transcription Factor-3SOXB1 Transcription FactorsTranscription FactorsKruppel-Like Transcription FactorsOctamer Transcription Factor-3SOXB1 Transcription FactorsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID34117345
PMCPMC8257633
OpenAlexW3172849025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.