Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34117156›Full record

SynthesisPsychosomatic medicine2021

Gut Microbiota in Psychiatric Disorders: A Systematic Review.

Long Long Chen, Afrouz Abbaspour, George F Mkoma, Cynthia M Bulik, Christian Rück, Diana Djurfeldt

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Psychosomatic medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Long Long ChenFrom the Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Centre for Psychiatry Research (Chen, Rück, Djurfeldt), Karolinska Institutet, & Stockholm Health Care Services, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics (Abbaspour, Mkoma, Bulik), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Public Health, Section for Health Services Research (Mkoma), University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Departments of Psychiatry and Nutrition (Bulik), University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Afrouz Abbaspour
George F Mkoma
Cynthia M Bulik
Christian Rück
Diana Djurfeldt

Funding

Eating Disorders Genetics Initiative (EDGI)R01MH120170 · NIMH · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BULIK, CYNTHIA M · 2019 to 2023
$7.2M
Predicting the multi-omic impact of psychiatric GWAS associationsR01MH118278 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI HUCKINS, LAURA MARIANNE · 2019 to 2023
$3.6M
Predicting Binge and Purge Episodes from Passive and Active Apple Watch Data Using a Dynamical Systems ApproachR01MH119084 · NIMH · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BULIK, CYNTHIA M, BUTNER, JONATHAN · 2019 to 2022
$2.8M
1/7 Psychiatric Genomics Consortium: Finding actionable variationU01MH109528 · NIMH · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI SULLIVAN, PATRICK F · 2016 to 2020
$2.5M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH118278NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH119084NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH120170NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH109528
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis systematic review sought to comprehensively summarize gut microbiota research in psychiatric disorders following PRISMA guidelines.

methodsLiterature searches were performed on databases using keywords involving gut microbiota and psychiatric disorders. Articles in English with human participants up until February 13, 2020, were reviewed. Risk of bias was assessed using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for microbiota studies.

resultsSixty-nine of 4231 identified studies met the inclusion criteria for extraction. In most studies, gut microbiota composition differed between individuals with psychiatric disorders and healthy controls; however, limited consistency was observed in the taxonomic profiles. At the genus level, the most replicated findings were higher abundance of Bifidobacterium and lower abundance of Roseburia and Faecalibacterium among patients with psychiatric disorders.

conclusionsGut bacteria that produce short-chain fatty acids, such as Roseburia and Faecalibacterium, could be less abundant in patients with psychiatric disorders, whereas commensal genera, for example, Bifidobacterium, might be more abundant compared with healthy controls. However, most included studies were hampered by methodological shortcomings including small sample size, unclear diagnostics, failure to address confounding factors, and inadequate bioinformatic processing, which might contribute to inconsistent results. Based on our findings, we provide recommendations to improve quality and comparability of future microbiota studies in psychiatry.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeMental DisordersBacteriaBifidobacteriumFaecalibacteriumHumans

Identifiers

PMID34117156
PMCPMC8428865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.