Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34116824›Full record

Trial reportJournal of substance abuse treatment2021

Peer recovery services for persons returning from prison: Pilot randomized clinical trial investigation of SUPPORT.

Bradley Ray, Dennis P Watson, Huiping Xu, Michelle P Salyers, Grant Victor, Emily Sightes, Katie Bailey, Lisa Robison Taylor, Na Bo

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of substance abuse treatment, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Bradley RayCenter for Behavioral Health and Justice, School of Social Work, Wayne State University, 5447 Woodward Ave, Detroit, MI 48202, United States of America. Electronic address: bradray@wayne.edu.
Dennis P WatsonLighthouse Institute, Chestnut Health Systems, 221 West Walton St., Chicago, IL 60610, United States of America. Electronic address: dpwatson@chestnut.org.
Huiping XuDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Medicine, Indiana University, 410 W. 10th St., Indianapolis, IN 46202, United States of America. Electronic address: huipxu@iu.edu.
Michelle P SalyersDepartment of Psychology, Indiana University - Purdue University Indianapolis, 402 N. Blackford St., Indianapolis, IN 46202, United States of America. Electronic address: mpsalyer@iupui.edu.
Grant VictorCenter for Behavioral Health and Justice, School of Social Work, Wayne State University, 5447 Woodward Ave, Detroit, MI 48202, United States of America. Electronic address: grantvictor@wayne.edu.
Emily SightesCenter for Behavioral Health and Justice, School of Social Work, Wayne State University, 5447 Woodward Ave, Detroit, MI 48202, United States of America. Electronic address: emilysightes@wayne.edu.
Katie BaileyCenter for Behavioral Health and Justice, School of Social Work, Wayne State University, 5447 Woodward Ave, Detroit, MI 48202, United States of America. Electronic address: katiebailey@wayne.edu.
Lisa Robison TaylorCenter for Dissemination and Implementation Science, Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, 818 S. Wolcott, Chicago, IL 60612, United States of America. Electronic address: ldrobiso@uic.edu.
Na BoDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Medicine, Indiana University, 410 W. 10th St., Indianapolis, IN 46202, United States of America. Electronic address: nbo@iu.edu.

Funding

Developing SUPPORT, a Community-Driven, Recovery-Oriented System of CareR34DA041640 · NIDA · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI RAY, BRADLEY, SALYERS, MICHELLE P. · 2016 to 2018
$653k
NIDA NIH HHS R34 DA041640
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previously incarcerated persons with substance use disorder (SUD) need recovery supports, given the overrepresentation of this population in prison and community supervision. Peer support programs have the potential to fill gaps in postrelease support for persons with SUD. To assess the effectiveness of peer support approaches, this pilot study randomized access to peer recovery coaches within a well-established community reentry program. We examined several proximal outcomes to determine potential mechanisms of action, along with several exploratory outcomes. While attrition due to re-incarceration, death, and program disengagement was high, our findings suggest that those who received peer recovery coach support in the reentry program had recovery-based improvements, including improved self-reported mental and physical health and reductions in substance use behaviors. The treatment group also saw improvements in measures of treatment motivation and self-efficacy. Both groups saw similar positive trends in some outcomes, likely due to the relative success of the well-established reentry program regardless of the inclusion of peer support coaches. This study contributes lessons learned and potential mechanisms of action to limited research on the effectiveness of peer recovery supports for reentry populations with SUD.

Indexed as

PrisonsSubstance-Related DisordersCounselingHumansPeer GroupPilot ProjectsPeer recovery coachReentrySubstance use treatment

Identifiers

PMID34116824
PMCPMC8248907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.