Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34116722›Full record

ArticleMovement ecology2021

Fusion of wildlife tracking and satellite geomagnetic data for the study of animal migration.

Fernando Benitez-Paez, Vanessa da Silva Brum-Bastos, Ciarán D Beggan, Jed A Long, Urška Demšar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Movement ecology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Fernando Benitez-PaezSchool of Geography and Sustainable Development, Irvine Building, University of St Andrews, North Street, St Andrews, KY16 9AL, Scotland, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9884-6471
Vanessa da Silva Brum-BastosSchool of Geography and Sustainable Development, Irvine Building, University of St Andrews, North Street, St Andrews, KY16 9AL, Scotland, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5865-0204
Ciarán D BegganBritish Geological Survey, Research Ave South, Riccarton, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2298-0578
Jed A LongSchool of Geography and Sustainable Development, Irvine Building, University of St Andrews, North Street, St Andrews, KY16 9AL, Scotland, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3961-3085
Urška DemšarSchool of Geography and Sustainable Development, Irvine Building, University of St Andrews, North Street, St Andrews, KY16 9AL, Scotland, UK. urska.demsar@st-andrews.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7791-2807

Funding

Leverhulme Trust RPG-2018-258
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMigratory animals use information from the Earth's magnetic field on their journeys. Geomagnetic navigation has been observed across many taxa, but how animals use geomagnetic information to find their way is still relatively unknown. Most migration studies use a static representation of geomagnetic field and do not consider its temporal variation. However, short-term temporal perturbations may affect how animals respond - to understand this phenomenon, we need to obtain fine resolution accurate geomagnetic measurements at the location and time of the animal. Satellite geomagnetic measurements provide a potential to create such accurate measurements, yet have not been used yet for exploration of animal migration.

methodsWe develop a new tool for data fusion of satellite geomagnetic data (from the European Space Agency's Swarm constellation) with animal tracking data using a spatio-temporal interpolation approach. We assess accuracy of the fusion through a comparison with calibrated terrestrial measurements from the International Real-time Magnetic Observatory Network (INTERMAGNET). We fit a generalized linear model (GLM) to assess how the absolute error of annotated geomagnetic intensity varies with interpolation parameters and with the local geomagnetic disturbance.

resultsWe find that the average absolute error of intensity is - 21.6 nT (95% CI [- 22.26555, - 20.96664]), which is at the lower range of the intensity that animals can sense. The main predictor of error is the level of geomagnetic disturbance, given by the Kp index (indicating the presence of a geomagnetic storm). Since storm level disturbances are rare, this means that our tool is suitable for studies of animal geomagnetic navigation. Caution should be taken with data obtained during geomagnetically disturbed days due to rapid and localised changes of the field which may not be adequately captured.

conclusionsBy using our new tool, ecologists will be able to, for the first time, access accurate real-time satellite geomagnetic data at the location and time of each tracked animal, without having to start new tracking studies with specialised magnetic sensors. This opens a new and exciting possibility for large multi-species studies that will search for general migratory responses to geomagnetic cues. The tool therefore has a potential to uncover new knowledge about geomagnetic navigation and help resolve long-standing debates.

Indexed as

Animal migrationData fusionEarth’s magnetic fieldGPS trackingSwarm satellite constellation

Identifiers

PMID34116722
PMCPMC8196450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.