Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34116707›Full record

SynthesisCritical care (London, England)2021

Perioperative liberal versus restrictive fluid strategies and postoperative outcomes: a systematic review and metanalysis on randomised-controlled trials in major abdominal elective surgery.

Antonio Messina, Chiara Robba, Lorenzo Calabrò, Daniel Zambelli, Francesca Iannuzzi, Edoardo Molinari, Silvia Scarano, Denise Battaglini, Marta Baggiani, Giacomo De Mattei and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Critical care (London, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Postoperative Weight Gain within Enhanced Recovery after Cardiac Surgery.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2023
    Article
  19. Advances of perioperative acute kidney injury in elderly patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery.Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Antonio MessinaDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Via Alessandro Manzoni, 56, 20089, Rozzano, MI, Italy. antonio.messina@humanitas.it.ORCID 0000-0002-9744-1659
Chiara RobbaAnaesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS for Oncology and Neuroscience, San Martino Policlinico Hospital, Genoa, Italy.
Lorenzo CalabròDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Via Alessandro Manzoni, 56, 20089, Rozzano, MI, Italy.
Daniel ZambelliDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Via Alessandro Manzoni, 56, 20089, Rozzano, MI, Italy.
Francesca IannuzziAnaesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS for Oncology and Neuroscience, San Martino Policlinico Hospital, Genoa, Italy.
Edoardo MolinariAnaesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS for Oncology and Neuroscience, San Martino Policlinico Hospital, Genoa, Italy.
Silvia ScaranoAnaesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS for Oncology and Neuroscience, San Martino Policlinico Hospital, Genoa, Italy.
Denise BattagliniAnaesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS for Oncology and Neuroscience, San Martino Policlinico Hospital, Genoa, Italy.
Marta BaggianiAnesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Maggiore Della Carità University Hospital, Novara, Italy.
Giacomo De MatteiAnesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata Udine, Udine, Italy.
Laura SaderiClinical Epidemiology and Medical Statistics Unit, Department of Medical, Surgical and Experimental, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy.
Giovanni SotgiuClinical Epidemiology and Medical Statistics Unit, Department of Medical, Surgical and Experimental, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy.
Paolo PelosiAnaesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS for Oncology and Neuroscience, San Martino Policlinico Hospital, Genoa, Italy.
Maurizio CecconiDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Via Alessandro Manzoni, 56, 20089, Rozzano, MI, Italy.
Ospedale Policlinico San Martino · ITHumanitas University · ITUniversity of Sassari · ITOspedale Santa Maria della Misericordia di Udine · ITUniversità degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale “Amedeo Avogadro” · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPostoperative complications impact on early and long-term patients' outcome. Appropriate perioperative fluid management is pivotal in this context; however, the most effective perioperative fluid management is still unclear. The enhanced recovery after surgery pathways recommend a perioperative zero-balance, whereas recent findings suggest a more liberal approach could be beneficial. We conducted this trial to address the impact of restrictive vs. liberal fluid approaches on overall postoperative complications and mortality.

methodsSystematic review and meta-analysis, including randomised controlled trials (RCTs). We performed a systematic literature search using MEDLINE (via Ovid), EMBASE (via Ovid) and the Cochrane Controlled Clinical trials register databases, published from 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2019. We included RCTs enrolling adult patients undergoing elective abdominal surgery and comparing the use of restrictive/liberal approaches enrolling at least 15 patients in each subgroup. Studies involving cardiac, non-elective surgery, paediatric or obstetric surgeries were excluded.

resultsAfter full-text examination, the metanalysis finally included 18 studies and 5567 patients randomised to restrictive (2786 patients; 50.0%) or liberal approaches (2780 patients; 50.0%). We found no difference in the occurrence of severe postoperative complications between restrictive and liberal subgroups [risk difference (95% CI) = 0.009 (- 0.02; 0.04); p value = 0.62; I

trial registrationCRD42020218059; Registration: February 2020, https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=218059 .

Indexed as

Digestive System Surgical ProceduresFluid TherapyHumansOutcome Assessment, Health CareRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicFluid therapyLiberalPostoperative complicationsPostoperative mortalityRestrictive

Identifiers

PMID34116707
PMCPMC8194047
OpenAlexW3166696558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.