Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34116502›Full record

ArticleJournal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN2021

Association Between Chronologic Age and Geriatric Assessment-Identified Impairments: Findings From the CARE Registry.

Smith Giri, Mustafa Al-Obaidi, Alice Weaver, Kelly M Kenzik, Andrew McDonald, Deanna Clark, Crystal Young-Smith, Ravi Paluri, Lakshmin Nandagopal, Olumide Gbolahan and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Smith Giri1Institute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship.
Mustafa Al-Obaidi1Institute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship.
Alice Weaver3Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
Kelly M Kenzik1Institute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship.
Andrew McDonald1Institute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship.
Deanna Clark1Institute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship.
Crystal Young-Smith3Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
Ravi Paluri2O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, and.
Lakshmin Nandagopal2O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, and.
Olumide Gbolahan2O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, and.
Mackenzi Pergolotti4Revital Cancer Rehabilitation, Select Medical, Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania; and.
Smita Bhatia1Institute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship.
Grant R Williams1Institute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship.

Funding

Myopenia and Mechanisms of Chemotherapy Toxicity in Older Adults with Colorectal Cancer: The M&M StudyK08CA234225 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI WILLIAMS, GRANT R · 2018 to 2022
$1.0M
NCI NIH HHS K08 CA234225
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe NCCN Guidelines for Older Adult Oncology recommend that, when possible, older adults with cancer undergo a geriatric assessment (GA) to provide a comprehensive health appraisal to guide interventions and appropriate treatment selection. However, the association of age with GA-identified impairments (GA impairments) remains understudied and the appropriate age cutoff for using the GA remains unknown. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe designed a cross-sectional study using the Cancer and Aging Resilience Evaluation (CARE) registry of older adults with cancer. We included adults aged ≥60 years diagnosed with gastrointestinal malignancy who underwent a patient-reported GA prior to their initial consultation at the gastrointestinal oncology clinic. We noted the presence of GA impairments and frailty using Rockwood's deficit accumulation approach. We studied the relation between chronologic age and GA impairments/frailty using Spearman rank correlation and chi-square tests of trend.

resultsWe identified 455 eligible older adults aged ≥60 years with gastrointestinal malignancies; the median age was 68 years (range, 64-74 years) and colorectal (33%) and pancreatic (24%) cancers were the most common cancer type. The correlation between chronologic age and number of geriatric impairments was weak and did not reach statistical significance (Spearman ρ, 0.07; P=.16). Furthermore, the prevalence of domain-specific impairments or frailty was comparable across the 3 age groups (60-64 years, 65-74 years, ≥75 years) with the exception of comorbidity burden. Notably, 61% of patients aged 60 to 64 years had ≥2 GA impairments and 35% had evidence of frailty, which was comparable to patients aged 65 to 74 years (66% and 36%, respectively) and ≥75 years (70% and 40%, respectively).

conclusionsUsing chronologic age alone to identify which patients may benefit from GA is problematic. Future studies should identify screening tools that may identify patients at high risk of frailty and GA impairments.

Indexed as

FrailtyGastrointestinal NeoplasmsNeoplasmsAgedCross-Sectional StudiesGeriatric AssessmentHumansMiddle AgedRegistries

Identifiers

PMID34116502
PMCPMC8599624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.