Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34116139›Full record

ArticleNeurobiology of learning and memory2021

Postmeal optogenetic inhibition of dorsal hippocampal principal neurons increases future intake in a time-dependent manner.

S B Briggs, C B Ware, K Sharma, S C Davis, R T Lalumiere, M B Parent

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurobiology of learning and memory, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

S B BriggsNeuroscience Institute, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, 30303, USA.
C B WareNeuroscience Institute, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, 30303, USA.
K SharmaNeuroscience Institute, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, 30303, USA.
S C DavisNeuroscience Institute, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, 30303, USA.
R T LalumiereDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences and Iowa Neuroscience Institute, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
M B ParentNeuroscience Institute, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, 30303, USA; Department of Psychology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, 30303, USA.
Georgia State University · USUniversity of Iowa · US

Funding

Hippocampal Modulation of Energy IntakeR01DK114700 · NIDDK · GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI PARENT, MARISE B · 2018 to 2020
$1.5M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK114700
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research involving human participants indicates that memories of recently eaten meals limit how much is eaten during subsequent eating episodes; yet, the brain regions that mediate the inhibitory effects of ingestion-related memory on future intake are largely unknown. We hypothesize that dorsal hippocampal (dHC) neurons, which are critical for episodic memories of personal experiences, mediate the inhibitory effects of ingestion-related memory on future intake. Our research program aimed at testing this hypothesis has been influenced in large part by our mentor James McGaugh and his research on posttraining manipulations. In the present study, we used an activity-guided optogenetic approach to test the prediction that if dHC glutamatergic neurons limit future intake through a process that requires memory consolidation, then inhibition should increase subsequent intake when given soon after the end of a meal but delayed inhibition should have no effect. Viral vectors containing CaMKIIα-eArchT3.0-eYFP and fiber optic probes were placed in the dHC of male Sprague-Dawley rats. Compared to intake on a day when no inhibition was given, postmeal inhibition of dHC glutamatergic neurons given for 10 min after the end of a saccharin meal increased the likelihood that rats would consume a second meal 90 min later and significantly increased the amount of saccharin solution consumed during that next meal when the neurons were no longer inhibited. Importantly, delayed inhibition given 80 min after the end of the saccharin meal did not affect subsequent intake of saccharin. Given that saccharin has minimal postingestive gastric consequences, these effects are not likely due to the timing of interoceptive visceral cues generated by the meal. These data show that dHC glutamatergic neural activity is necessary during the early postprandial period for limiting future intake and suggest that these neurons inhibit future intake by consolidating the memory of the preceding meal.

Indexed as

AnimalsCalcium-Calmodulin-Dependent Protein Kinase Type 2Feeding BehaviorGlutamic AcidHippocampusInteroceptionMemoryMemory ConsolidationNeuronal PlasticityNeuronsOptogeneticsPostprandial PeriodRatsCalcium-Calmodulin-Dependent Protein Kinase Type 2Camk2a protein, ratGlutamic AcidHippocampusIngestionMemory consolidationPosttrainingSynaptic plasticity

Identifiers

PMID34116139
PMCPMC8319148
OpenAlexW3172482372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.