Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34115781›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Development of the Bristol Rabbit Pain Scale (BRPS): A multidimensional composite pain scale specific to rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus).

Livia Benato, Joanna Murrell, Toby G Knowles, Nicola J Rooney

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A Focal Ophthalmic Lesion in a New Zealand White Rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus).Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Effects of Intratesticular Lidocaine in Pet Rabbits Undergoing Orchiectomy.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Uncontrolled pain: a call for better study design.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2024
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review of Rat (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Livia BenatoAnimal Welfare and Behaviour, School of Veterinary Sciences, University of Bristol, Langford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2399-4194
Joanna MurrellHighcroft Veterinary Referrals, Whitchurch, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Toby G KnowlesAnimal Welfare and Behaviour, School of Veterinary Sciences, University of Bristol, Langford, United Kingdom.
Nicola J RooneyAnimal Welfare and Behaviour, School of Veterinary Sciences, University of Bristol, Langford, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A species-specific composite pain scale is a prerequisite for adequate pain assessment. The aim of this study was to develop a multidimensional pain scale specific to rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) called the Bristol Rabbit Pain Scale (BRPS). The scale was developed over five phases using a unique combination of methods: focus groups and behavioural observation. The first two phases aimed at identifying descriptors to describe a rabbit in pain, and then reducing their number, both using focus groups. A total of 72 pain descriptors were grouped under six categories (Demeanour, Posture, Facial expression, Attention to the painful area, Audible and Other) and 'No pain' descriptors were added. The third phase aimed to confirm, through video observation of rabbits, the categories and descriptors previously described, to reject those terms that were ambiguous, and identify any new descriptors that had not been included in the previous list of descriptors. This led to the rejection of the categories Audible and Attention to the painful area and of 34 descriptors. Seven new descriptors were identified. The last two phases constructed the final format of the BRPS by refining the categories, ranking the descriptors on an ordinal scale and testing the internal reliability of the scale using Cronbach's alpha test. This led to a composite pain scale of six categories (Demeanour, Posture, Locomotion, Ears, Eyes and Grooming) with four intensities of pain (0, 1, 2, and 3), a total score of 0-18, and a high Cronbach's alpha coefficient (alpha = 0.843). This BRPS fills an important gap in the field of rabbit medicine and has the potential to improve the assessment and management of pain in rabbits providing veterinary professionals with a novel multidimensional pain assessment tool. Further studies will investigate the clinical utility, validity and reliability of the BRPS.

Indexed as

Pain MeasurementAnimalsBehavior, AnimalFacial ExpressionFemaleMalePainRabbitsReproducibility of ResultsSpecies Specificity

Identifiers

PMID34115781
PMCPMC8195426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.