Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34115775›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Evaluation of diagnostic ultrasound use in a breast cancer detection strategy in Northern Peru.

Segen Aklilu, Carolyn Bain, Pooja Bansil, Silvia de Sanjose, Jorge A Dunstan, Vanesa Castillo, Vivien Tsu, Ines Contreras, Ronald Balassanian, Tara K Hayes Constant and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Segen AkliluDepartment of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Carolyn BainPATH, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8569-7924
Pooja BansilPATH, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Silvia de SanjosePATH, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Jorge A DunstanInstituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas, Lima, Peru.
Vanesa CastilloPATH, Lima, Peru.
Vivien TsuDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Ines ContrerasPATH, Lima, Peru.
Ronald BalassanianDepartment of Pathology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Tara K Hayes ConstantSea Mar Community Health Centers, Burien, Washington, United States of America.
John R ScheelDepartment of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0998-0098
Program for Appropriate Technology in Health · USUniversity of Washington · USCommunity Health Center · USInstituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas · PEUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To evaluate the diagnostic impact of point-of-care breast ultrasound by trained primary care physicians (PCPs) as part of a breast cancer detection program using clinical breast exam in an underserved region of Peru. Medical records and breast ultrasound images of symptomatic women presenting to the Breast Cancer Detection Model (BCDM) in Trujillo, Peru were collected from 2017-2018. Performance was measured against final outcomes derived from regional cancer center medical records, fine needle aspiration results, patient follow-up (sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive values), and by percent agreement with the retrospective, blinded interpretation of images by a fellowship-trained breast radiologist, and a Peruvian breast surgeon. The diagnostic impact of ultrasound, compared to clinical breast exam (CBE), was calculated for actual practice and for potential impact of two alternative reporting systems. Of the 171 women presenting for breast ultrasound, 23 had breast cancer (13.5%). Breast ultrasound used as a triage test (current practice) detected all cancer cases (including four cancers missed on confirmatory CBE). PCPs showed strong agreement with radiologist and surgeon readings regarding the final management of masses (85.4% and 80.4%, respectively). While the triage system yielded a similar number of biopsies as CBE alone, using the condensed and full BI-RADS systems would have reduced biopsies by 60% while identifying 87% of cancers immediately and deferring 13% to six-month follow-up. Point-of-care ultrasound performed by trained PCPs improves diagnostic accuracy for managing symptomatic women over CBE alone and enhances access. Greater use of BI-RADS to guide management would reduce the diagnostic burden substantially.

Indexed as

Ultrasonography, MammaryAdultBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansObserver VariationPeruPoint-of-Care TestingReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID34115775
PMCPMC8195385
OpenAlexW3169118444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.