Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34115749›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2021

Mass spectrometry and machine learning for the accurate diagnosis of benzylpenicillin and multidrug resistance of Staphylococcus aureus in bovine mastitis.

Necati Esener, Alexandre Maciel-Guerra, Katharina Giebel, Daniel Lea, Martin J Green, Andrew J Bradley, Tania Dottorini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. PredictingmSystems · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Precision Medicine Approaches with Metabolomics and Artificial Intelligence.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Necati EsenerUniversity of Nottingham, School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, Sutton Bonington, United Kingdom.
Alexandre Maciel-GuerraUniversity of Nottingham School of Computer Science, Jubilee Campus, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1396-9438
Katharina GiebelQuality Milk Management Services ltd, Easton, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6037-0618
Daniel LeaDigital Research Service, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8152-0398
Martin J GreenUniversity of Nottingham, School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, Sutton Bonington, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6408-6443
Andrew J BradleyUniversity of Nottingham, School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, Sutton Bonington, United Kingdom.
Tania DottoriniUniversity of Nottingham, School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, Sutton Bonington, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7733-906X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Staphylococcus aureus is a serious human and animal pathogen threat exhibiting extraordinary capacity for acquiring new antibiotic resistance traits in the pathogen population worldwide. The development of fast, affordable and effective diagnostic solutions capable of discriminating between antibiotic-resistant and susceptible S. aureus strains would be of huge benefit for effective disease detection and treatment. Here we develop a diagnostics solution that uses Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionisation-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry (MALDI-TOF) and machine learning, to identify signature profiles of antibiotic resistance to either multidrug or benzylpenicillin in S. aureus isolates. Using ten different supervised learning techniques, we have analysed a set of 82 S. aureus isolates collected from 67 cows diagnosed with bovine mastitis across 24 farms. For the multidrug phenotyping analysis, LDA, linear SVM, RBF SVM, logistic regression, naïve Bayes, MLP neural network and QDA had Cohen's kappa values over 85.00%. For the benzylpenicillin phenotyping analysis, RBF SVM, MLP neural network, naïve Bayes, logistic regression, linear SVM, QDA, LDA, and random forests had Cohen's kappa values over 85.00%. For the benzylpenicillin the diagnostic systems achieved up to (mean result ± standard deviation over 30 runs on the test set): accuracy = 97.54% ± 1.91%, sensitivity = 99.93% ± 0.25%, specificity = 95.04% ± 3.83%, and Cohen's kappa = 95.04% ± 3.83%. Moreover, the diagnostic platform complemented by a protein-protein network and 3D structural protein information framework allowed the identification of five molecular determinants underlying the susceptible and resistant profiles. Four proteins were able to classify multidrug-resistant and susceptible strains with 96.81% ± 0.43% accuracy. Five proteins, including the previous four, were able to classify benzylpenicillin resistant and susceptible strains with 97.54% ± 1.91% accuracy. Our approach may open up new avenues for the development of a fast, affordable and effective day-to-day diagnostic solution, which would offer new opportunities for targeting resistant bacteria.

Indexed as

Staphylococcus aureusAnimalsBacterial ProteinsCattleComputational BiologyDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialFemaleHumansMastitis, BovineMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusMicrobial Sensitivity TestsModels, MolecularPenicillin GProtein Interaction MapsSpectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-IonizationBacterial ProteinsPenicillin G

Identifiers

PMID34115749
PMCPMC8221797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.