Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34115604›Full record

ArticleJMIR mental health2021

Intervention Use and Symptom Change With Unguided Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Log Data Analysis of a Convenience Sample.

Caroline Oehler, Katharina Scholze, Hanna Reich, Christian Sander, Ulrich Hegerl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mental health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Caroline OehlerDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8329-147X
Katharina ScholzeForschungszentrum Depression, Stiftung Deutsche Depressionshilfe, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6379-474X
Hanna ReichForschungszentrum Depression, Stiftung Deutsche Depressionshilfe, Frankfurt, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9577-1144
Christian SanderDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5402-6631
Ulrich HegerlForschungszentrum Depression, Stiftung Deutsche Depressionshilfe, Frankfurt, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3039-7470

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInternet- and mobile-based interventions are most efficacious in the treatment of depression when they involve some form of guidance, but providing guidance requires resources such as trained personnel, who might not always be available (eg, during lockdowns to contain the COVID-19 pandemic).

objectiveThe current analysis focuses on changes in symptoms of depression in a guided sample of patients with depression who registered for an internet-based intervention, the iFightDepression tool, as well as the extent of intervention use, compared to an unguided sample. The objective is to further understand the effects of guidance and adherence on the intervention's potential to induce symptom change.

methodsLog data from two convenience samples in German routine care were used to assess symptom change after 6-9 weeks of intervention as well as minimal dose (finishing at least two workshops). A linear regression model with changes in Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) score as a dependent variable and guidance and minimal dose as well as their interaction as independent variables was specified.

resultsData from 1423 people with symptoms of depression (n=940 unguided, 66.1%) were included in the current analysis. In the linear regression model predicting symptom change, a significant interaction of guidance and minimal dose revealed a specifically greater improvement for patients who received guidance and also worked with the intervention content (β=-1.75, t=-2.37, P=.02), while there was little difference in symptom change due to guidance in the group that did not use the intervention. In this model, the main effect of guidance was only marginally significant (β=-.53, t=-1.78, P=.08).

conclusionsGuidance in internet-based interventions for depression is not only an important factor to facilitate adherence, but also seems to further improve results for patients adhering to the intervention compared to those who do the same but without guidance.

Indexed as

COVID-19depressionguidanceiCBTinternet- and mobile-based interventioninternet-based cognitive behavioral therapyinternet-based treatmentunguided

Identifiers

PMID34115604
PMCPMC8288646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.